It turns out that others have busted "Abel Danger" as being a disinfo outlet as well. (Thankfully, I stopped listening to their bogus crap years ago ['06] when the subscribers to my list researched their claims.)
Some guys at the Prison Planet forum were highly skieptical. Here is one such comment (p.1).
Quote from: Sane on February 11, 2010, 09:24:52 AM
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Field McConnell & David Hawkins: February 2010
[http://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2010/02/field-mcconnell-david-hawkins-february.html](http://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2010/02/field-mcconnell-david-hawkins-february.html)
10 Feb 2010—Listen—Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
9 Feb 2010—Listen—Part 1, Part 2
3 Feb 2010—Listen—Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
I have been following these guys for a while and I think they are disinfo. They have some of the usual suspects and then mix in new ones with some striking omissions. Where is Cheney or the Bushs -- buddy says that Bush senior is just a pawn who is easily manipulated because he is being extorted. No I disagree and think the bushies rank up a little higher on the totem pole.
When I was checking out other stuff from them I came across a Project Camelot interview and she was holding one of them to the fire and he had great difficulty weaseling out of the line of question. Project Camelot has to be taken with a degree of skepticism and his interview didnt boost his credibility.
He does sound good though but upon further scrutiny things dont add up quite right. I question this escrow account betting scenario, corralling competitive interests in the towers for gassing pre-demolition, this enhanced involvement of women, etc.
Plus I dont trust anyone who tells me how amazed they are with their own intelligence.
"It was strange to hear in one breath talk of the tea parties being hijacked by Beck and co and then in the next breath a whack of Palin worship and how great she is for the movement. Huh?"
AND -
"I want to know why they think that Michelle Obama is a greater threat to liberty than Queen Elizabeth II or Queen Beatrix. Anyway, more and more I suspect they are a new version of the fake left/right as they really go full steam against Dems and then somehow minimize any issues with GOP psychopaths. I still think that they drop a lot of information that needs to be followed up. And they only give the good information when confronted like when project camelot confronted them about the vaccines which are obviously a trojan horse for more powerful genocidal projects. I do have to hand it to project camelot for never letting people just rattle on with their agenda. Project camelot was also instrumental in exposing benjamin fulford as an NWO sympathizer. So in any case, these guys definitely fit the bill as the Noam Chomskies of the right as far as their military backgrounds and intelligence backgrounds. What that means is that they must provide some useful information to keep their cover and through those pieces, follow up may reveal some good stuff."
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
It turns out that others have busted "Abel Danger" as being a disinfo outlet as well. (Thankfully, I stopped listening to their bogus crap years ago ['06] when the subscribers to my list researched their claims.)
Some guys at the Prison Planet forum were highly skieptical. Here is one such comment (p.1).
Quote from: Sane on February 11, 2010, 09:24:52 AM
I have been following these guys for a while and I think they are disinfo. They have some of the usual suspects and then mix in new ones with some striking omissions. Where is Cheney or the Bushs -- buddy says that Bush senior is just a pawn who is easily manipulated because he is being extorted. No I disagree and think the bushies rank up a little higher on the totem pole.
When I was checking out other stuff from them I came across a Project Camelot interview and she was holding one of them to the fire and he had great difficulty weaseling out of the line of question. Project Camelot has to be taken with a degree of skepticism and his interview didnt boost his credibility.
He does sound good though but upon further scrutiny things dont add up quite right. I question this escrow account betting scenario, corralling competitive interests in the towers for gassing pre-demolition, this enhanced involvement of women, etc.
Plus I dont trust anyone who tells me how amazed they are with their own intelligence.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=159463.0
AND -
"It was strange to hear in one breath talk of the tea parties being hijacked by Beck and co and then in the next breath a whack of Palin worship and how great she is for the movement. Huh?"
AND -
"I want to know why they think that Michelle Obama is a greater threat to liberty than Queen Elizabeth II or Queen Beatrix. Anyway, more and more I suspect they are a new version of the fake left/right as they really go full steam against Dems and then somehow minimize any issues with GOP psychopaths. I still think that they drop a lot of information that needs to be followed up. And they only give the good information when confronted like when project camelot confronted them about the vaccines which are obviously a trojan horse for more powerful genocidal projects. I do have to hand it to project camelot for never letting people just rattle on with their agenda. Project camelot was also instrumental in exposing benjamin fulford as an NWO sympathizer. So in any case, these guys definitely fit the bill as the Noam Chomskies of the right as far as their military backgrounds and intelligence backgrounds. What that means is that they must provide some useful information to keep their cover and through those pieces, follow up may reveal some good stuff."