You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Cigarette5mokingman ago

I don't need to be reminded of what any anon said. The fact that you're depending on what some anonymous guy on 4chan claiming to be a fbi insider is ridiculous. You been disappointed everytime? Why ? Because an anonymous source is no source at all. End of story

/thread

paulf ago

In the words of FBIanon himself, believe what you will. But he:

  • predicted the exact date and time of a tweet from the FBI Vault twitter account
  • predicted that close examination of the yet to be released Podesta emails would reveal something sinister using coded terminology
  • predicted Trump would win with a 95% certainty
  • accurately described an awful lot of details about the Clinton Foundation which were only dug up later

This was in July last year. That's why anyone with a functioning brain cell realized he was for real.

Cigarette5mokingman ago

Do you have proof of these claims of accurate predictions?

I would think anyone with a functioning brain cell would provide sources to such claims before making statements like that, but hey, we all get provin wrong sometimes.

paulf ago

Hey moron, why does Pizzagate even exist? Because FBIanon got a whole bunch of us looking in the right places MONTHS before the email evidence started coming out. If you haven't bothered to actually read what he originally claimed and then checked out his claims, then nothing I say is going to help you. You've already misrepresented what I posted so I guess basic comprehension isn't high on your list of skills.

Cigarette5mokingman ago

Lol, spoken like someone who says something without backing it up with sourced evidence, then when called out on it, gets belligerent. Once again to everyone here claiming to be a "researcher". It's not up the reader to "look it up", it's up to the person making the claim to source it. So do that or stfu. Seriously.

paulf ago

In the link I give to the wiki, the very first paragraph explains the reasons for trusting FBIanon. Here, I'll cut and paste it because you're too stupid to follow links to sources:

To summarize how FBIAnon's got a reputation as being legitimate, there are a few obvious reasons; (s)he gave a lot of information that seemed to line up, and on top of that, the FBIRecordsVault twitter account[1] releasing the Clinton Investigation document on Nov 1st at 11am [2] after an anon on 4chan says "Nov 1st at 11am the house of cards collapses" and Wikileaks said phase 3 was hitting on nov 1. Even if that is all a coincidence, an FBI agent still released the Clinton Investigation document on Nov 1st out of the blue. At the least, the source is someone inside the FBI. FOIA requests are supposedly not added to their records vault, indicating that someone inside the FBI was involved in the unofficial leaks.

TL;DR Fuck off.