Here is a link that has a transcript of the meetings where George Lucas and Stephen Spielberg (and Lawrence Kasdan) discuss and form the Indiana Jones character:
http://archive.is/ogQTX
Here is the relevant passage:
George Lucas: I was thinking that this old guy could have been the mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.
Lawrence Kasdan: And he was forty-two.
George Lucas: He hasn’t seen her in twelve years. Now she’s twenty-two. It’s a real strange relationship.
Steven Spielberg: She had better be older than twenty-two.
George Lucas: He’s thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time.
Steven Spielberg: And promiscuous. She came onto him.
George Lucas: Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it’s an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she’s sixteen or seventeen it’s not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. And she was madly in love with him and he...........
And here is a line from "Marion" the female in the film:
Marion: "I was too young, it was wrong and you knew it,"
Indys response: "You knew what you were doing"?
Relevant to pizzagate because we all know that Hollywood is a huge part of the problem / puzzle and we need to identify those involved in spreading the culture of paedophilia.
view the rest of the comments →
mysecretidentity ago
George lucas is an over hyped hack. sick piece of shit, blaming the 12 year old. People write about what they know. ..
kestrel9 ago
Pedos often blame the victims; call it the delusional part of the mindset...not unlike when rapists claim, 'she wanted it'; 'she liked it'; 'she came on to me'.
christa ago
As someone who was a victim of sexual assault at a party, I am all too familiar with "she wanted it". It was part of what lead me to conclude I shouldn't involve the police; who would believe me? I had a couple drinks, and there were no witnesses. Plus, these days, you'll find wealthy white dudes hardly ever do much time, if at all -- even when they admit guilt.
It wasn't too long ago a judge decided a 40-year old man who raped a 12-year old girl should receive ZERO time behind bars. IIRC the child was a relative of his and the judge sympathized after reading a letter from the girl's mother who pleaded for leniency and forgiveness in regards to the rapist's punishment. In my eyes, that is the textbook definition of an unfit mother, but as this subverse has proven, CPS is generally no better. My heart hurts for that child :(
kestrel9 ago
Very sorry to hear not only that you were assaulted but then had no recourse for justice. Regarding the case you mentioned, it turns out it was the girl's father who had raped her at least 3 times. http://archive.is/OBtzV He agreed to plead guilty to one count. "The state had recommended the 40-year-old father of three serve a 100-year prison sentence with 75 years suspended — in effect, 25 years — and the dismissal of two other incest charges as part of a plea deal. “A father repeatedly raped his 12-year-old daughter,” the Valley County deputy attorney, Dylan Jensen, said during the sentencing hearing on Oct. 4, 2016. But in handing down his sentence, Judge John C. McKeon of Valley County District Court noted that lawyers for the defendant could argue for a less-severe punishment if an evaluator recommended treatment in a local community." So the rapist gets the plea deal, two counts are dismissed, THEN the evaluation is recommended by the Judge. When the results came in that claimed the father wasn't a risk to re-offend, the Judge gave him 60 days with time served of 17, so 43 days. How can a minimum 3 time (there's usually more) rapist be considered not a risk of raping either his daughter or someone else's daughter? And regardless if he didn't do it again, there is no justice, he should have served time in prison, not hang out singing kumbaYa at Mr. Sullivan's community center.
"In handing down the sentence on Oct. 4, Judge McKeon cited a report prepared by Michael D. Sullivan, a specialist who had performed more than 2,000 evaluations over a nearly 30-year career. Mr. Sullivan, who performed a psychosexual evaluation of the victim’s father, found that he could “be safely treated and supervised” in a local community and that such treatment was available, the judge wrote in his ruling." So the 'law', i.e. Judge McKeon, was more concerned about the mother and the two sons (who see that their Dad can rape their sister and get away with it), working out "their" good relationship with dad, while the victim has to watch her back and live with nightmares because her rapist was the sympathetic character in the mother's eyes. Sick.
turitelle ago
Must be a buddy of Roman Polanski, blaming a child for him raping her ... but you know... its art.
They all need to be strung up by their you know what's.
contrarianism ago
Maybe George thought it wasn't "rape rape".
christa ago
Todd Akin will tell you it isn't 'legitimate rape'.