@cakeoflightylight: you've been here long enough to understand the submission guidelines for v/pizzagate. Please repost this unsourced discussion post to v/pizzagatewhatever, or add links and make it a research post. I am surprised to see you piling on during the forum-sliding attack, I really am. :(
I'm not sure what you're talking about. I don't regulate my posts according to what a shill is currently doing. There's no way to link an idea for taking action. I only have a law degree and life experience to reference.
But you DO know that v/pizzagate posts have to include links to support. And you DO know that the reason we have these rules is so that we can remove real shitposts that have no support. You could easily have added links to things such as an article on how to make a FOIA request, when a FOIA request has to be complied with and when it doesn't, etc. Instead, on a day when we have literally dozens of shills posting crap designed to discourage people, slide real news off the board, and disrupt the community, you make a post that gives a fat middle finger to the submission guidelines and spends the first half enumerating all the ways justice will never be served. I am seriously questioning what side of this you are actually on.
"Instead, on a day when we have literally dozens of shills posting crap designed to discourage people, slide real news off the board, and disrupt the community, you make a post that gives a fat middle finger to the submission guidelines and spends the first half enumerating all the ways justice will never be served. I am seriously questioning what side of this you are actually on."
Again, you deleted my post within 5 minutes. I'm not sorry that I assumed that a well outlined plan for action wasn't a "shit post." But insulting me and "questioning" what side I am on is ironic considering all of the things you guys delete all the time that are relevant and well-supported. Posting links to an internet article allows a post to stay up. That's fine. I will be reposting my original post in pizzagate with about 10 links and if you have a problem with my post after that, I guess I will have to seek further feedback on how to comply with your rule. Dr. www.whateverlink.com is ok but my JD and 12 years of activism experience are not ok. Got it.
Cakeoflightylight, you do understand that ignoring the submission guidelines the community developed to enable mods to remove posts from trolls and shills to keep the board functioning is disrespectful to the users of v/pizzagate, right?
You've been here a long time, yet you disregard the guidelines and then get bent out of shape when your post is removed in a fair and consistent manner, along with dozens of others. Yes, we delete relevant posts; no, we do not delete relevant, well-supported posts that satisfy the submission guidelines. I challenge you to show me one. If you see it happening, you can complain to v/ProtectVoat and bring down the wrath of Voat on whomever did it.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@cakeoflightylight: you've been here long enough to understand the submission guidelines for v/pizzagate. Please repost this unsourced discussion post to v/pizzagatewhatever, or add links and make it a research post. I am surprised to see you piling on during the forum-sliding attack, I really am. :(
cakeoflightylight ago
I'm not sure what you're talking about. I don't regulate my posts according to what a shill is currently doing. There's no way to link an idea for taking action. I only have a law degree and life experience to reference.
Vindicator ago
But you DO know that v/pizzagate posts have to include links to support. And you DO know that the reason we have these rules is so that we can remove real shitposts that have no support. You could easily have added links to things such as an article on how to make a FOIA request, when a FOIA request has to be complied with and when it doesn't, etc. Instead, on a day when we have literally dozens of shills posting crap designed to discourage people, slide real news off the board, and disrupt the community, you make a post that gives a fat middle finger to the submission guidelines and spends the first half enumerating all the ways justice will never be served. I am seriously questioning what side of this you are actually on.
cakeoflightylight ago
"Instead, on a day when we have literally dozens of shills posting crap designed to discourage people, slide real news off the board, and disrupt the community, you make a post that gives a fat middle finger to the submission guidelines and spends the first half enumerating all the ways justice will never be served. I am seriously questioning what side of this you are actually on."
Again, you deleted my post within 5 minutes. I'm not sorry that I assumed that a well outlined plan for action wasn't a "shit post." But insulting me and "questioning" what side I am on is ironic considering all of the things you guys delete all the time that are relevant and well-supported. Posting links to an internet article allows a post to stay up. That's fine. I will be reposting my original post in pizzagate with about 10 links and if you have a problem with my post after that, I guess I will have to seek further feedback on how to comply with your rule. Dr. www.whateverlink.com is ok but my JD and 12 years of activism experience are not ok. Got it.
Vindicator ago
Cakeoflightylight, you do understand that ignoring the submission guidelines the community developed to enable mods to remove posts from trolls and shills to keep the board functioning is disrespectful to the users of v/pizzagate, right?
You've been here a long time, yet you disregard the guidelines and then get bent out of shape when your post is removed in a fair and consistent manner, along with dozens of others. Yes, we delete relevant posts; no, we do not delete relevant, well-supported posts that satisfy the submission guidelines. I challenge you to show me one. If you see it happening, you can complain to v/ProtectVoat and bring down the wrath of Voat on whomever did it.
cakeoflightylight ago
I don't seek out censorship so, no.