Defends pedophiles, says not to arrest them /
Defends pedos the Maccobys /
"Former" CIA officer, LMAO! /
Nobel Peace Prize (!) nominee /
Espouses "alien" bullcrap /
1.) A truth-and-reconciliation outlook is not defending pedophiles.
2.) We don't know for sure that the Maccobys are pedophiles. He stuck up for two that he knows personally: A woman who does art and her father. (I don't remember their names.)
3.) "There's no such thing as an ex-CIA officer" is just a meme. "LMAO" doesn't cut it.
Really, if you want to know what he has to say about CIA, read his work. This guy isn't just a mouthpiece, he's got a shitload of written stuff. Everyone just seems to think they can just dish out little quips based on tiny little segments of things he's said and call him "debunked." The truth is more complicated than that approach.
Maybe if Victurus Libertas have him on again, he can address some specifics. I know he kind of already did.
Why does Steele need to have an excuse as to why Trump hasn't contacted him? Even if Trump saw him on YouTube and decided not to contact him, it wouldn't mean that it's because Steele is a bullshitter. Wouldn't Steele know much more about the government than Trump, anyway? What is the likelihood that Trump would ask for someone else's opinion about Steele before making a decision, assuming he knew of him and his whole thing? You can't really say it's unlikely. Say he does do that, what is the likelihood that that person either 1.) would have poor judgment 2.) would be "compromised," or otherwise more in-line with Deep State interests?
You really have to keep the complexity of social interaction and situational awareness in mind to make any meaningful guesses about why someone did or didn't do this or that. Unknown unknowns, incomplete information, inaccurate information, misunderstandings, misinterpretations, misjudgments, mis-remembering, then deceit, malice, etc.
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
RDS:
Defends pedophiles, says not to arrest them / Defends pedos the Maccobys / "Former" CIA officer, LMAO! / Nobel Peace Prize (!) nominee / Espouses "alien" bullcrap /
He has ZERO credibility.
dFrog ago
1.) A truth-and-reconciliation outlook is not defending pedophiles. 2.) We don't know for sure that the Maccobys are pedophiles. He stuck up for two that he knows personally: A woman who does art and her father. (I don't remember their names.) 3.) "There's no such thing as an ex-CIA officer" is just a meme. "LMAO" doesn't cut it.
Really, if you want to know what he has to say about CIA, read his work. This guy isn't just a mouthpiece, he's got a shitload of written stuff. Everyone just seems to think they can just dish out little quips based on tiny little segments of things he's said and call him "debunked." The truth is more complicated than that approach.
Maybe if Victurus Libertas have him on again, he can address some specifics. I know he kind of already did.
cantsleepawink ago
Trump won't meet with him. I wonder why that is ?
dFrog ago
Because Priebus is blocking him and Bannon may not want to share Trump's ear.
cantsleepawink ago
He's sent out out quite a few calling cards on the internet already. Trump is his own man. That excuse doesn't wash with me.
dFrog ago
Why does Steele need to have an excuse as to why Trump hasn't contacted him? Even if Trump saw him on YouTube and decided not to contact him, it wouldn't mean that it's because Steele is a bullshitter. Wouldn't Steele know much more about the government than Trump, anyway? What is the likelihood that Trump would ask for someone else's opinion about Steele before making a decision, assuming he knew of him and his whole thing? You can't really say it's unlikely. Say he does do that, what is the likelihood that that person either 1.) would have poor judgment 2.) would be "compromised," or otherwise more in-line with Deep State interests?
You really have to keep the complexity of social interaction and situational awareness in mind to make any meaningful guesses about why someone did or didn't do this or that. Unknown unknowns, incomplete information, inaccurate information, misunderstandings, misinterpretations, misjudgments, mis-remembering, then deceit, malice, etc.
cantsleepawink ago
I only asked the Trump question to trigger you. I'm complex too.