People really need to stop bringing this up, along with the Madeline McCann composites. If you read the original article where the composite drawings were featured, it clearly says that both drawings are supposed to be of the SAME MAN, not two separate people. Plus, the drawings were made to try and find a man who was a potential WITNESS, not a suspect. The same kind of misinformation keeps going on with Spirit Cooking. Just because Marina Abramovic (who is a PERFORMANCE ARTIST, duh) painted some stupid words on a wall in pig's blood, everyone is being completely hyperbolic and saying it definitively connects to Satanic pedophilia rings, and that powerful people are actually consuming urine and semen. However, just a small amount of research easily revealed what Spirit Cooking really is. If you go to the Kickstarter page for the Marina Abramovic Institute (which actually looks like a school I would kill to attend), do a Ctrl+F and search for "Spirit Cooking" and it will bring you right to the section where rewards for backers are detailed. This is what it says for backers who donate $10,000:
"[LIVE EVENT / THE EXERCISES: SPIRIT COOKING WITH MARINA ABRAMOVIC] A dinner night with Marina during which she will teach you and other backers at this level how to cook a series of traditional soups, which you will all enjoy together. The night will end with the making of a golden ball, a recipe given to Marina in a Tibetan monastery. Marina will bring to this dinner a Spirit Cooking memento for each backer to keep. PLUS MAI and OMA office tour, Neuroscience Exclusives, OMA / MAI Digital Design Package, Complete Abramovic Method Exclusives, access to ALL $25 live stream exercises / live events, MAI 101 Lecture and Digital Booklet, MAI Founder (CHAMBER FOUNDER), Digital MAI rewards, and The Embrace rewards."
Here's the link: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/maihudson/marina-abramovic-institute-the-founders
So can we please shut up about Spirit Cooking? Pretty please?
view the rest of the comments →
Catchthem ago
Fuck you! Member for 13 minutes David Brock paid pedo loving SHILL. I guess you have not followed this whole investigation, else you wouldn't state such stuppid things.
VisceraHood ago
I've obviously followed it more than you. And I also did something that none of you here seem to be capable of: I had an open mind about things, and although I fully believe that PizzaGate AND PedoGate are very real, I also am open-minded enough to look at other points of view instead of just focusing on biased reports by triggered liberals and evidence that only fits one side of the argument. Some of the evidence presented by online PizzaGate investigators is hyperbolic and unproven, and I am merely pointing that out. Why is that so bad? It doesn't make me a shill. It simply makes me an intelligent human being who questions things. But I understand your bewilderment. Anybody born after 1995 wouldn't know anything about logic and rational thought.
Whattheheck321 ago
The pictures of the Podesta brothers may have been leaked by an inside source who was trying to either threaten them or let people know they were involved. So the "it was a description of one man" does not debunk their possible involvement and the possible importance of those pictures. Secondly just because you found a description of spirit cooking does not mean that it is a genuine account of it. Also if you are sincere I would point out that your condescending tone isn't helpful. Maybe it's unintentional but it serves to put people off of your point.
SterlingJB ago
My thoughts exactly, Whatheheck. The sketches are not conclusive evidence of anything, but the explanation or debunking makes absolutely no sense in more ways than one. The "one man" somehow gained weight on his face by the time the second witness saw him, and the combined sketches happened to look a lot like the podesta bros? I've looked for a reasonable explanation for why two witnesses saw "one man" yet produced sketches of two very different looking men and have found none.
Catchthem ago
Just another stuppid thing you state; "It simply makes me an intelligent human being who questions things. But I understand your bewilderment. Anybody born after 1995 wouldn't know anything about logic and rational thought." Ofcourse there are many verry intelligent people born after 1995 out there!! You are just not one off them..