The connection to pizzagate here is the elite trying to normalize pedophilia, and that pedophilia is being covered up in Hollywood, which has close ties to Washington.
This is yet another example of pedophilia being normalized by Hollywood, in the show "Family Guy." It couldn't be any more blatant. There's a child character who regularly engages in graphic sexual behavior and speech.
I watched a few episodes of Family Guy once because I'd heard about how evil this show is, and just in those three episodes the child characters were involved in a number of sexual acts and conversations. I can't even go into describing what those child characters were involved in doing, because the things were so disturbing. If "Family Guy" was a live action show, they would have to cut half the show at least, since actual human child actors wouldn't be allowed to do and say those things. It would be considered child pornography, not evening entertainment. Yet this show is allowed to go out to children.
I found an article describing the types of things in this show that involve children in sexual behavior.
In an episode described by parentstv.org, the father character takes a sexual interest in his own daughter. Meanwhile, the mother character takes a sexual interest in her daughter's teen aged boyfriend, and tries to convince him to have sex with her - statutory rape.
In the same episode, the hybrid child/adult character, Stewie, a baby who also acts like an adult, dresses as a woman and gets sexual advances from the family dog/human adult character, Brian.
BRIAN: “I'm sorry. I didn't mean to come on too strong.”
STEWIE: “Oh, that's alright. I've been missing a man's touch, lo, these many months.”
BRIAN: “And I've been missing a woman's touch.”
Brian caresses Stewie's hand and pulls it down toward his crotch.
STEWIE: “Brian, Brian! It's me! Stewie! Oh my god, that was hilarious. You really fell for it!”
Stewie tells Brian that he's the new little girl on the program Jolly Farm. When Brian threatens to tell Lois, Stewie forces him to keep it a secret and insists that Brian becomes his on-set guardian.
STEWIE: “Brian, we both know I touched it. Now, if you'd like to keep that just between us, I suggest you sit back down and order me some chicken fingers.”
A dog molesting a little boy, dressed as a little girl. Before anyone complains, the PTC does realize that this is a cartoon. Talking dogs do not exist. Granted.
Yet, when a two-dimensional baby deer lost its mother in a forest fire, we cried. When a computer-generated robot character combed the planet alone, we sympathized with its loneliness. And when a widower and young boy strapped balloons to a house, we cheered their journey.
Cartoons aren’t real --but the emotions they evoke are.
http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/bw/2010/0319worst.asp
view the rest of the comments →
can_of_wurms ago
Is this how dry the investigation has become? Talking about the writers of a cartoon show? Sure, if you're looking for ways these guys are connected to it. But you aren't. A hunt for symbols and metaphor in art is not how we nailed Abramovic, and it's not how we could nail the writers of Family Guy. This is a waste of resources.
Psalm100 ago
It's a cartoon pornography show, featuring cartoon child pornography. Like I mentioned to someone else, in one episode I watched, the teen girl had serious sexual contact with her teen brother.
Don't try to muddy the waters by reducing the content to the medium of "cartoon," and what's been traditionally thought of as "cartoons," as if we're talking about Bugs Bunny or Tom and Jerry. You very well know the point is the content, not the medium.
can_of_wurms ago
You can't put a TV show in jail. If you have any leads regarding the writers, do that instead. You are the one muddying the waters, not me.
Edit: cartoon = TV show
Psalm100 ago
Family Guy's content speaks for itself, and speaks for its creators. There are few people that could depict incest between teens as family entertainment. Yet this is being presented to young people and children.
can_of_wurms ago
It does not speak for itself. Podesta's emails speak for themselves, but your argument falls on its face because you're attacking a medium. Are the writers pedophiles? Is there anything tying them to illegal behavior? If you've got nothing to show in regards to that, then you are nothing but a pathetic concern troll, and you're weakening this sub.
Psalm100 ago
Just address presenting incest between two teens as family entertainment. What do you think of that? We know pizzagate has many connections to Hollywood, and this comes right out of Hollywood.
can_of_wurms ago
File a report with the Hollywood police against the show then... or do something that makes sense and go after the writers. This is not a lead. This is smoke.
Psalm100 ago
Now that we know what the show's content is, we can look at the people behind it, and the people behind other shows that are similar.
can_of_wurms ago
I've been telling you that since the start, dumbass.
Psalm100 ago
You can say this wasn't a productive thread, but I don't see it that way. And I'm a Christian. I can also wish you the best.
can_of_wurms ago
Productive? List the leads you've gotten since this thread. Do you even have any of the head writers' names besides MacFarlane? Are any of them mentioned in any wikileaks emails? Do any of them have ties to Abramovic? Anything at all? If not, then you can kindly shut the fuck up.
Psalm100 ago
You aren't anywhere near the sole judge of things here. Many other investigators found this thread productive. And from your use of personal invective, it's clear you aren't being objective.
can_of_wurms ago
An investigation thrives on leads. The only thing I see in this whole thread is "Look how much pedophilic imagery there is in this show! How terrible." No connections to real pedophiles or real evidence, because this joke of a thread is not part of the real investigation. From the fact that you can't address any opportunities to follow up shows me just how de-railing you really want to be.
Psalm100 ago
Again, your opinion is just that. Many other people don't share it. And this isn't my first post. I've provided many bits of information that in your narrow definition would qualify as leads. It seems to me from you throwing out such an accusation at me, when my posting history is available, that you maybe want to be derailing. If you think this thread is a waste of time, spend it elsewhere. Why are you here when this is an old thread getting hardly any attention anymore? (not that it even got all that much attention to begin with).
can_of_wurms ago
You can see from my comment history that I'm no shill. You have made some good posts, sure. But then this.
Why not start with "FG is pedophilic. Any leads on the writers?" To comment about the content of a show without any intention of following up on the whereabouts of anyone involved in its production is just such a waste.
Psalm100 ago
To make the statement that "FG is pedophilic" evidence is needed to back it up, and that's what I provided. I got some leads through the discussion here, and I think some other people did too.
can_of_wurms ago
You can't put a TV show in handcuffs. I don't know what your endgame is here regarding FG because you have made no attempt to investigate the private lives of these writers, who by extension of your logic MAY BE AFFILIATED WITH, OR MAY THEMSELVES BE, PEDOPHILES.
Unless your only reason for posting this thread is to say "Look how pedophilic this show is. Let's all stop watching it", which in regards to the larger goal of this subvoat is a COMPLETE waste of time and a clear case of not seeing the forest for the trees.
Like I said, instead of using the content of the show as a potential springboard to researching and exposing pedophiles, you stayed comfortable condemning the content of the show itself.