You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

9217 ago

I've been telling people to look into the CIA for months. And you are turning that lead into a way of attacking Assange and Wikileaks who are right now the greatest proponents and legitimate hope for fighting the CIA.

For example - you start with "everything is the CIA"

Main body of post: "Assange is a Rothschild." Which you do not show has anything to do with your statements re: the CIA.

You are incorrect about the CIA "doing nothing" to expose abuses while "possessing untold years of evidence". Actually that's an understatement. For decades the CIA participated actively in this abuse, documented electroshocking and drugging children. Orchestrating abuse and covering it up. They were not so innocent as simply ignoring or not prosecuting.

Go Back to David Brock and tell him this isn't Buzzfeed.

Justaryde ago

You believe as you wish.

They are one in the same. Hard to grasp, I know, but do you really think Michael Hastings was more threatening than Assange? Think about that.

One was a real threat. The other lives in an embassy in London getting lunchtime BJ's from mk-ultra/playmate/cia asset Pamela Anderson.

Fuck you and david brock, shill.

9217 ago

Interesting that you're here arguing this a convenient four days after Assange embarrassed the CIA so badly.

I can't imagine who might be interested in coming to this specific corner of the internet and sewing division in support for Wikileaks four days after they caught a massive intelligence agency with its pants down.

With an account three hours old.

Justaryde ago

Again, believe as you wish. The connections are not my unique ideas. They are common sense connections.

I am stating 'trust no one'. Not the CIA, not assange/wikileaks, not me. Use your head.

Do you really think the CIA/Mi5/6 could not eliminate ANYONE they truly viewed as a threat within 24 hours of the decision being made, and it NOT looking like a hit?

He is a tool just like the rest. Wikileaks is a social engineering and manipulation instrument. You may not wish to accept that, but the power of those at the top of the pyramid could quickly and vastly disrupt communications and the flow of information instantly, as well as silence any true threats to their existence or agenda. To believe otherwise is IMHO indicative of naiveté to this subject matter.

samhara ago

There is no need to trust anyone. So why are you on and on about it?

Justaryde ago

Because unlike yourself, most detractors here seem to disagree with your statement "There is no need to trust anyone".

I am encouraging them to trust no one. Not MSM, not CIA, not wikileaks, not me, etc...

samhara ago

No need to trust Wikileak 3/ 7 leak .

Just read it. And read the various analysis on VOAT and be so grateful we don't live in England, Germany, Canada or Australia, Or any of the other countries "Great Britain" [should say "City of London") fucks with.

I feel we are done with the staged GLADIO shooters . Trump won't go for it. [ Fuck you very much Rothschilds, Buh Bye]

I am not putting out the fire of enthusiasm and happiness over what has been going on.. I'm in tears of happiness. I never imagined it.

samhara ago

It's just a rule if you study security issues.

You are advised to avoid situations where you have to trust anyone.

Naturally the government and Most Importantly the Mass Media talking head liars are trusted by the sheeples.

At least with this latest CIA leak you sniff the air and realize yeah, they're setting up a system whereby the can round people up , as they do in other countries.

The stuff I found out yesterday about "Obama" and Indonesia flipped my head. It's too long for here..

But the real danger is gone now that HRC / Obama / Bush Nexus has lost power.. Phew.