You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

Don't worry about it. The archive link shows Emily McMullin's name:

http://archive.is/tAIO8

That's enough evidence she set it up. It doesn't matter what it says today, generalcouncil I think it says.

reasonedandinformed ago

Yes, but we know that they CAN actually edit the archives. That is what happened to archive.org (part of what I documented in the post). The fact that they literally hard edited ICANN WHOIS and archive.org shows this to be very important. They are trying to scrub any evidence of her connection to the server that they targeted with the FISA request as a method to frame Trump for ties to Russia.

DarkMath ago

"they literally hard edited ICANN WHOIS"

That cuts both ways. One man's hard editing is another man's obstruction of justice.

Think of the big picture here. They knew if Hillary didn't win they'd be going to jail anyway. So why not manufacture evidence and hack a little used Trump server to make it look like it's communicating with a Russian owned bank.

Same thing here, hack into the ICANN WHOIS page and remove the evidence, they're going to jail anyway.

The problem for them is they'll be LUCKY to get a jail sentence if you know what I mean. You can't kill 1300 Syrian men, women and children in a false flag Sarin attack in Ghouta and get off with a slap on the wrist.

Whoever planned that false flag has another thing coming.

reasonedandinformed ago

Oh, this is absolute obstruction of justice. I see no innocent explanation for provable editing of historical pages of record of a domain registration, which has legal ramifications. The whole thread we put together is very damaging for them to go to these lengths.

DarkMath ago

"for them to go to these lengths."

Yep. That's how desperate they are. Their goose is cooked and they know it. It's just a matter of time now.