Comey: There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America (pizzagate)

submitted ago by SoSpricyHotDog

Comey: 'You're stuck with me'

Hmmm... so, in this ceremony, Comey mentions that we are "stuck with" him for 6+ years and that “there is no such thing as absolute privacy in America”

Really Comey? No such thing as absolutely privacy? Because from where I'm standing it certainly looks like you are offering EXACTLY this to Clinton and her cohorts as it relates to the various email leaks and crimes. As well as the re-opened investigation based on the evidence held by the NYPD. The clear perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence and collusion that you so obviously discovered and immediately dismissed during the initial Clinton investigation. I call bullshit.

Release the Weiner/Abedin emails if there is no such thing as absolutely privacy. Instead of buckling, re-opening the case, and then slamming it shut in 5 days once you contained the threat via gag order/tying the hands of law enforcement.

The article ends with:

"Before diving into his 45 minutes of remarks, Comey made clear that he would not take questions from the media or about issues he didn’t want to talk about.

“I’m very slippery,” he added."

So slippery that YOU and those you are protecting can expect absolute privacy? How convenient.

There IS such a thing as absolutely privacy at the highest levels. This is why we are all 100% dependent on leaks to gain any semblance of an understanding as to what is happening at the highest levels of our own government, even if these activities are criminal and/or in direct violation of our constitutional rights.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

thelastcoldwarrior ago

That means they have every bit of electronic evidence they need to bust everyone involved in PizzaGate. They just refuse to allow it to be used.

He picked a side, alright.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

If we are to believe those who claim to be "insiders" - yeah, that seems to be the consensus. From FBIAnon/DHS Anon (Via Victurus), to Robert D. Steele to Steve Pieczenik, Roger Stone and Erik Prince... each of these individuals has come forward to claim that insiders have told them that all of this evidence exists.

Either that it was all pre-existing and historically monitored/recorded, or that it was recently unveiled on the Weiner/Abedin laptop.

So. Two possibilities. They are ALL lying or this is truly being withheld with an incredibly strong gag order in place applied to anyone that has seen it/knows where it is.

Personally? As a father. If I had access to information like this (FBI, NYPD, DHS, etc.) I would not be so cowardly as to protect it. I would go straight to Wikileaks and make the world a better place. Even if that means I would be their final snuff film, at least I would know that my kids and their kids would live a safer life.

Or... they could all be collectively full of shit! Haha.

AreWeSure ago

Or you could have fallen for a political hoax.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Or... maybe that's why I began with "If we are to believe" and ended with "they could all be collectively full of shit!"

Not sure I fell for anything when I'm applying healthy grains of salt to my commentary.

FuckReddit69 ago

You don't need wikileaks to do that, that actually might be counter-productive considering they have been compromised. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1701044/8327459

SoSpricyHotDog ago

So you think the 1% released of Vault7 thus far was intentionally done by the CIA?

FuckReddit69 ago

possibly. if they had damning evidence on anyone even remotely important, wtf are they waiting for ?

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Personally, I think the Vault7 stuff is way too damaging for the CIA to have released it intentionally.

There seems to be a relatively high likelihood that Wikileaks is intentionally slowing their releases to comply with a larger, coordinated effort. The evidence of this goes all the way back to Assange's press conference. Remember he said he had the goods on HRC? He was alluding to a massive leak specific to Clinton & Co.

However, when this webcast went live, he was visibly nervous and basically shared nothing at all.

I do think "they" got to him... but I think "they" are two prong. First, we have the Deep State enemies of the people, likely threatening/DDOS'ing/Cutting his internet... and Second, I think that true patriots from within the FBI/CIA may be working covertly with Assange to ensure that he doesn't leak too much, too soon, as it could* jeopardize their ability to cut the heads off of the hydra all at once.

Remember, if the cards are played too early and evidence is poured without having the proper groundwork laid - a lot of people implicated could flee, go into hiding, off themselves, etc.

At least this is what I am hoping for.