You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

reasonedandinformed ago

My assessment: The OP brings this "find" with great excitement. A review makes it clear that they are the rants of a clearly crazy person, making no sense at all. If she is a true victim, the crazy communication may make some sense, but it is impossible to really understand all of this without more explanation or corroboration. The OP misrepresents all of the "data" as being something the intelligence community is interested in when, in fact, STRATFOR received this spam from this woman. I see no evidence that they sent anything related or seemed to be concerned with it. For some reason, the OP really focuses on the rants that implicate Trump. Is there a reason for this? It seems to point to more of an agenda than a search for information and the truth.

awarenessadventurer ago

Lets find all of her court case filings in canada over the last 20 years then we can talk again about my intentions and agenda.