According to U.S. intelligence sources, President Bush obstructed justice last December when he had senior advisor Karl Rove and White House Counsel Harriet Miers instruct Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez to fire eight U.S. attorneys who were among several others conducting ongoing public corruption and secret national security grand jury investigations connected to an espionagealinked prostitution / pedophile sex ring operating at the Washington Ritz-Carlton and other DC hotels, whose clients included U.S. senators and congressmen, elite Washington news reporters and high government officialsasome of whom were named by an intelligence insider.
Central to the scandal is fired U.S. attorney Carole Lam of California who was reportedly conducting testimony before grand juries linking indicted former Bush CIA Executive Director Kyle aDustya Foggo and convicted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff to the sex ring, Israeli espionage, GOP Under Secretary of Defense for policy Douglas J. Feith, a forged British intelligence dossier used by Mr. Bush to deceive Americans into supporting war against Iraq and an attempt to plant weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq before the war via an intelligence pipeline through Dubai and Turkey.
Not from Vault7, but from the Stratfor emails, but there it is: pizzagate coverup in living color. Assuming the email is accurate.
I have not doubt the email is authentic...that doesn't mean it is accurate/true. That is, if someone sent an email full of lies to someone at Stratfor, and then all the emails were leaked to Wikileaks -- it would be an authentic leaked email, but what it says might not be true. Make sense?
I don't doubt Wikileaks' incredible track record. But JA would be the first to tell us to keep a critical eye on what we read and attempt to verify the accuracy of the content.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
Well look at that:
Not from Vault7, but from the Stratfor emails, but there it is: pizzagate coverup in living color. Assuming the email is accurate.
party1981 ago
Every WL email is authentic. They guard their reputation absolutely, it's all they have.
The CIA hasn't denied a single Vault7 document. Nobody has ever really denied Wikileaks, except for a few off the cuff remarks that did not pan out.
Vindicator ago
I have not doubt the email is authentic...that doesn't mean it is accurate/true. That is, if someone sent an email full of lies to someone at Stratfor, and then all the emails were leaked to Wikileaks -- it would be an authentic leaked email, but what it says might not be true. Make sense?
I don't doubt Wikileaks' incredible track record. But JA would be the first to tell us to keep a critical eye on what we read and attempt to verify the accuracy of the content.
party1981 ago
That's a great point. It would be nice to corroborate the story. Planting the story, before the wikileaks reveal, seems farfetched.