I am going to hunt through this thread for those links, because I found only one link that links to a AJ takedown here on voat which raises questions and offers a lesson in cointelpro behavior. From what I understand, the stratfor employee was an intern, not "running" Infowars. But so what - Stratfor can have white hats and black hats like most intelligence hangouts including Voat itself. In the video provided in the main post above, AJ specifically discusses how intelligence became interested in his output, and came to start informing him. I do not expect someone who delivers information on the internal war between white hat and black hat intelligence to have no contacts with intelligence - that wouldn't make any sense at all.

However the semantics of that turn out, I think for many, the proof is in the pudding with AJ. He has been on the frontline of the opposition against the global criminal network for so many years. He probably didn't rise out of angel food cake, and he is not pure, nor is he perfect. But he is not misleading people by championing Trump as President, or trying to shape Trump policies towards arresting globalist domination and setting the USA back on a path of economic prosperity and non-interventionist war and foreign policy. Fighting the out of control CIA is what we are all really doing at the end of the day.

The guys in the FBI or CIA countercoup that has taken place are not perfect at all, they are probably death dealers in fact with shady connections. Stone is a major dirty tricks political operative for example. But when you are fighting a war, and it is an information war which makes a very real difference in public action, such as the populist revolution that happened when people overturned the expected outcome by voting for Trump, you can't always be that choosy as far as who is on your side.

I've run into this before here, where heavy Christian oriented pizzagators, or so they say, argue against anybody who sticks their head up for the cause - neither Seaman, Titus Frost, Robert David Steele, IIsthisgaemeofthrones, Alex Jones, Bad Guacamole, FBIAnon, Gunderson, Webb, Kutcher or anyone else is "good enough", "pure enough", "clean enough", "said the right thing enough" to stand up for pizzagate. All of these have been accused repeatedly by those who wish to undermine the forward progress of the pedogate exposure effort of being variously disinfo, shills, out to make a buck, CoInTellPro, you name it. So the end result is we can't have any outspoken leaders because we are such a very very snow white and pure and discerning group. Right. That kind of strategy gets you nowhere, nothing, and nobody.

I listen to the message a lot more than a listen to the messenger's naysayers. In that group above, yes, Kutcher seems suspect as a Freemason and because of how THORN is embedded with establishment corporations, so it is important to be careful of your bedfellows. But not to the point of having no voice at all. And of course, if we listened to every disinfo shill attack that comes around and took it as gospel, we'd be handing the opposition and easy victory.