Where and how abuse happens:I have pretty much faced everything what is happening on the Internet regarding this theme. But the gruesome images of crying, raped and even tortured children do not come from commercial producers.They come not from third parties but from bestial fathers and mothers of the childrenthat do this to them. Most are fathers with incestuous tendencies who meet in forums and chats.
That part just sounds wrong to me, and some other things. I'd like to hear other thoughts.
I think whoever wrote this had an agenda in mind and that was to normalize pedophilia. Later, the writer says that pedos are not monsters and society must make a place for them because it is a sexual preference.
For many years I have made a clear distinction between pedos and people who abuse children. I have tended to believe that there has to be pedos out there that don't touch kids or view cp because it's wrong or illegal or whatever. I have been forced, lately, to revisit my thoughts on that particular stance.
Yep. All the technical things he writes about sound, to me, like he knows a lot of useful things about the technology of how this business works, but maybe that's just because I don't understand those things. Maybe one of our people here will comment on some of that. It's other things that made this fall apart for me. Things that contradict what I've heard here, and presented in a strange way, like two or three people working on one article. With bits of emotion, weirdly injected into matter-of-fact tone. Worse, this writer who claims to KNOW so much, hasn't disclosed a thing useful, and even implies that ending CP is a lost cause. I read it all again. Conclusion, this is a steaming pile of bullshit, and Fuck you David Brock, and the rest of you fuckhead pedo enablers.
view the rest of the comments →
rooting4redpillers ago
Where and how abuse happens: I have pretty much faced everything what is happening on the Internet regarding this theme. But the gruesome images of crying, raped and even tortured children do not come from commercial producers. They come not from third parties but from bestial fathers and mothers of the children that do this to them. Most are fathers with incestuous tendencies who meet in forums and chats.
That part just sounds wrong to me, and some other things. I'd like to hear other thoughts.
Commoner ago
I think whoever wrote this had an agenda in mind and that was to normalize pedophilia. Later, the writer says that pedos are not monsters and society must make a place for them because it is a sexual preference.
palmitespo910 ago
For many years I have made a clear distinction between pedos and people who abuse children. I have tended to believe that there has to be pedos out there that don't touch kids or view cp because it's wrong or illegal or whatever. I have been forced, lately, to revisit my thoughts on that particular stance.
rooting4redpillers ago
Yep. All the technical things he writes about sound, to me, like he knows a lot of useful things about the technology of how this business works, but maybe that's just because I don't understand those things. Maybe one of our people here will comment on some of that. It's other things that made this fall apart for me. Things that contradict what I've heard here, and presented in a strange way, like two or three people working on one article. With bits of emotion, weirdly injected into matter-of-fact tone. Worse, this writer who claims to KNOW so much, hasn't disclosed a thing useful, and even implies that ending CP is a lost cause. I read it all again. Conclusion, this is a steaming pile of bullshit, and Fuck you David Brock, and the rest of you fuckhead pedo enablers.
rippingtheveil ago
I know it's crazy to think about I feel so bad for the children
Piscina ago
Yeah, when I read these things, it's the children I think about.