They do a facebook stream on a Friday and update on the events of the week. I would say keep an eye on their FB tomorrow they know we want the scoop, they have gotten much better at uploading to youtube quickly but not always and not a live stream. They will probably be at that most of tomorrow so I dont actually expect anything tangible for a day or so while court docs and findings are digested. Legal route is painfully slow but steady, death by a thousand cuts. I suggested trying them as witches but the idea didnt take off.
Judicial watch are not a government entity they are a private organisation funded largely by donations as far as I recall I dont think they have ngo or 501c3 status. I digress, point is this time they are in front of a Judge. Judicial watch is suing them. The oversight committee where bless, I watched a lot of Chaffetz and Gowdy at work they dont actually have any powers to do anything, their job is not to prosecute or even blame its to see if everything was done above board. Even when they find something wrong they often have no power to further push for a conviction. Suing them really gets the legal gears turning and evidence placed on public display. Nearly every Hillary email outside of the original leaks has been produced under FOIA by JW, they have a special agreement so they can bulk FOIA at way discounted price compared to what anyone else generally has to pay.
view the rest of the comments →
DrumpfBTFO ago
Wasn't jucidial-watch streamed on youtube when they were discussing Clinton e-mails?. Hopefully theres a stream of this as well.
or nvm: guess thats a non-government website. I remember looking at that site's calendar, and pretty much always there was a stream up.
LostandFound ago
They do a facebook stream on a Friday and update on the events of the week. I would say keep an eye on their FB tomorrow they know we want the scoop, they have gotten much better at uploading to youtube quickly but not always and not a live stream. They will probably be at that most of tomorrow so I dont actually expect anything tangible for a day or so while court docs and findings are digested. Legal route is painfully slow but steady, death by a thousand cuts. I suggested trying them as witches but the idea didnt take off.
DrumpfBTFO ago
Hopefully its not pleading the fifth the entire time. The "anonymous sources" seems to indicate that Weiner is singing, hopefully.
LostandFound ago
Judicial watch are not a government entity they are a private organisation funded largely by donations as far as I recall I dont think they have ngo or 501c3 status. I digress, point is this time they are in front of a Judge. Judicial watch is suing them. The oversight committee where bless, I watched a lot of Chaffetz and Gowdy at work they dont actually have any powers to do anything, their job is not to prosecute or even blame its to see if everything was done above board. Even when they find something wrong they often have no power to further push for a conviction. Suing them really gets the legal gears turning and evidence placed on public display. Nearly every Hillary email outside of the original leaks has been produced under FOIA by JW, they have a special agreement so they can bulk FOIA at way discounted price compared to what anyone else generally has to pay.
DrumpfBTFO ago
Aah yea, it was the oversight committee i kept watching. Chaffetz and Gowdy were always nice to listen to after Cummings etc.