You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

GeorgeHodelDidit ago

Okay I am a 46 year old man who has never been particularly religious. My father is a true believer. We never went to church much as a kid. I am talking about you could count the times on my hands. In 2006 I had a moment where I believed and started to go to a church that was next door. Went about five-seven times and stopped after I couldnt get my wife to go. She is an opposed entirely.

After this Pizzagate stuff broke I started to get confused and more interested if only because the Satanist seem to believe and seem to hate the sheer mention of Jesus Christ.

I have done some research online and in books and have found about the theory that the Old Testament was originally four distinct books that were put together as one in a kind of blending process around the time of the Babylonian Exile. I have printed out and read the parts and how they flow when broken up into four stories. It does seem to have some merit.

Okay as a part of my Pizzagate research I came across a Documentary called Zeitgeist: The Movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTbIu8Zeqp0 It starts with a process of describing the parallels with the Egytian God Horus and Christ. It also broke down the Three Wise Men and the Resurrection story as being an Astrological Allegory. It was fairly convincing. They go so far as to dispute if Jesus ever existed but was kind of creation from Religious and Mythological ideas that were already thousands of years old.

So this leaves me very confused. I personally believe there was a man around the time that did go on a Religious mission. Attempting to get people to believe his ideas and he got crosswise of the Jewish Leaders and the Roman Authorities. I do believe he was crucified. My personal belief is that he did not die on the cross but was brought down when they thought he was dead. That he recovered enough to meet his followers again but after a month or so finally was brought down by the injuries he sustained during his ordeals and died.

I kind of believe his followers expected him to be a military Messiah for the Jews and were confused and shocked he died. That the more passionate of his followers had an epiphany and in a way of trying to understand why God took their Messiah early began to think of Jesus as a scapegoat for all of Humanities sins. The same Jewish custom of driving a goat around and putting all their sins into it and killing it. That Jesus was just a final and supreme scapegoat. Then over time the other Religious stories already going around were worked into the miracle component of the Jesus story. And this became the accepted idea of what Jesus was.

I believe Jesus was an inspired Human who really did come up with a much better way for humanity to treat each other. It was truly a miracle jump in human thought. I believe these Satanist hate Jesus so much because his beliefs force their human sacrifice to be forced underground and out of sight. His humanitarian nature is go kind and frankly good that it goes against their evil ideas.

I believe the Rothschilds believe entirely that the Book of Revelations is true and are using it as a blue print of what world they want to create to bring about the antichrist and the return of God which for them is Lucifer. They are setting up the world for a war to match with the Endtimes Stories.

So I kind of believe that even if you dont believe Jesus was the Son of God and did all the Miracles in the Bible. The point is the Satanist do believe most of it and they are the driving force leading Humanity at this time. So a greater understanding of the Bible and Jesus and the Occult is very very important for all of us to acquire.

Okay this is my two cents. I could be totally wrong.

bopper ago

The book The Passover Plot espoused the fake crucifixion you speak of, that is one evil and spooky book. The Beatles were into it when Paul died (yes he really did die).

GeorgeHodelDidit ago

What the book talks about is evil or the book itself is some manifestation of evil?

bopper ago

What the book hypothesizes is evil. Straight from hell. I was going through a (Biblical) spiritual conversion when it dropped in my lap (metaphorically speaking) and I wrestled hard against spiritual wickedness in high places. I destroyed the book and I hate even the mention of it.

The whole point of Christianity is that a real physical human sacrifice (which had to be none other than God in the flesh) was necessary to atone for man's sins. "Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin." This is why the heathen are so obsessed w/ human sacrifice, the point being to make a mockery of the one-time true sacrifice (or in their own minds, to provide their own sacrifices, over and over, in hopes that the multiplicity of them will appease the one true God).

The Passover Plot denies the reality of this, and the book logically speaking doesn't even make sense. It's ridiculous. A dead and non-resurrected Christ would not, could not, have sparked one of the greatest movements in the history of man. Christ's followers turned from cowering men to fearless leaders overnight. It was seeing the risen Christ that emboldened them. They risked their lives over it. (Thomas, of "doubting Thomas" fame, was so skeptical that he insisted that he be allowed to personally put his hands into the nail and sword prints of the risen Jesus Christ, which was granted to him. Whether he actually did it or not is not stated.)

The Roman church does this also in that they sacrifice (in their own minds) Christ over and over again in the mass ... their teaching of "transubstantiation," is that when the participant partakes of the wafer, the body and blood of Christ become real, which is blasphemy and outright cannibalism. They are a false (and worse) monolithic religion and global force/farce. Their followers kneel and worship the "holy father" who is just a man. "Call no man on earth father." The apostles were repulsed when men bowed to worship them and gave a strong rebuke.

A conversion experience is the only thing that will open one's eyes to accept and see this. The Reformation era has the truth, and some authors of today that espouse their teachings, there is very little real Christianity nowadays.

GeorgeHodelDidit ago

Where can someone find real Christanity? Is it a personal thing or with your family or is there any church movements that have not been heavily infiltrated by the Jew/Rothschild/Masonic cults?

bopper ago

So-called "reformed" churches are the only ones w/ the real truth, though they have become corrupt and sold out also (there is a "famine in the land" at present). Most of the decent ones are Dutch, and there is the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland which is (most of them) sound. These all follow the puritan reformed pure teachings of the Reformation era.

The Free Presbyterian Church (they have branches in various parts of the world, not many) is where Trump's mom's family is from, Scotland ... this is what made me begin to keep an eye on Trump, and what interests me about his new-found interest in religion (Christianity), albeit at the moment he is surrounded by phonies, but God can work through phonies. I have a clip if you want to see it.

You might be put off at first by their strictness (the aforementioned denominations) which some mistakenly label legalism (though legalism does exist and is just as erroneous as false liberty).

But one can obtain salvation (conversion, regeneration) outside of the church, by prayerfully seeking, from the scriptures, an internal working of God in and through Christ, which subsequent "subjective" conversion will 'agree' wholeheartedly with the "objective" word of God. It comes down to blood, the blood of the God/man Christ Jesus shed to placate an angry God for our offensive sins.

Yes I know this is a hated and maligned thing, an "angry" God.