Although I totally agree w all the points brought out, even in this interview we are hit w the burden of proof... Leak a document, give us more...I didn't learn any more from this 'interview' than I already know. In fact, any one of the voat investigators could have done this interview. Speaking in cryptic terms is not tough.
These "leaks" are to keep us interested or point is in a direction these "leakers" want us to look. No one will listen to a "leaker" for long if there information is always incorrect or just leaves you hanging. I think of them as "updates".
view the rest of the comments →
WeCanDoThisThing ago
Although I totally agree w all the points brought out, even in this interview we are hit w the burden of proof... Leak a document, give us more...I didn't learn any more from this 'interview' than I already know. In fact, any one of the voat investigators could have done this interview. Speaking in cryptic terms is not tough.
sponiatowski ago
These "leaks" are to keep us interested or point is in a direction these "leakers" want us to look. No one will listen to a "leaker" for long if there information is always incorrect or just leaves you hanging. I think of them as "updates".