This guy is still CIA loyal, I'm 90% sure. He constantly deflects away from blaming the CIA onto the NSA. It's well known that the CIA and the NSA hate each other. We all know the CIA is rotten and corrupt to the core, anybody who makes excuses for them is definitely a shill. Also why deflect from the Maccoby's? Does it have anything to do with the fact they're Jewish? Could be Israeli controlled disinfo, plus the CIA and Mossad are basically a package deal, they do all this evil shit together.
He doesn't shy away from dishing dirt on the CIA. I've been listening to every new interview he gives and I've known of him for several years. In part 3 of 3 of his latest VL interview, he says something like, "I'm sick of all these morons saying, 'Once CIA, always CIA.' Please. What about the books I've written with state senators calling for the evisceration of CIA?"
Here's another quote from yesterday: "NSA and CIA are part of the deep state and they're all working for Wall Street. All of them have their sweetheart deals, their offshore bank accounts, their special privileges. You have networks of people who are being blackmailed--not just for pedophilia, but for other indiscretions."
"Defending" is when you stick up for someone to protect them with no regard for whether or not they are standing on legitimate ground. I don't defend anyone or anything. I say what I think and more often than not, what I think is that other people's logic doesn't hold very well. If I thought either of these men were bullshitters, I would show them no mercy. This is just me disagreeing with you.
Besides, neither Seaman nor Steele have anything to do with me, so nothing I say has any bearing whatsoever on their trustworthiness.
Seaman is clearly not what he seems, only the most stubborn and/or blinded people are still denying that. So my point is that if someone still believes in Seaman, also believes in RDS, I like my odds having the opposite opinion on RDS.
That is still arbitrarily pivoting off of what I think and what I think is irrelevant to both of these men.
Here's another quote from the AMA where he was asked about CIA:
"VERY compartmentalized in one sense, and very open in another.
No. CIA is simply legalized crime on behalf of the White House, Wall Street, Saudi Arabia, the Vatican, the Zionists -- they work for everyone EXCEPT the American public.
War is a profit center that also produces children for pedophiles and organs for marketing.
The Clintons were entirely created by CIA. Bill Clinton, like Barack Obama, has been a Deep State president installed to screw the 99% for the 1%, at the direction of Wall Street."
So, knowing all that, why does he then call for the NSA to be dismantled and folded into the CIA? He actually even says NSA HQ should be demolished. So, the CIA is completely corrupt, and not only should continue to exist, but also gain the NSA's massive spying capabilities?
I think he means that he would like a reformed CIA to expand, not CIA as-is. He says that their power to be corrupt to the bone is based heavily on their ability to blackmail elected leaders and etc.
Here's a quote about James Comey from yesterday:
"Comey is a deep state kind of guy. He's a Lockheed Martin guy, he is a Rothschild guy. For a while there, he was on the board of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank which is the ultimate drug money-laundering, gold-busting, child pedophilia-funding bank in the world. It is THE apple of Rothschild's eye and Comey was a member of the board of directors there, ostensibly to provide ethical oversight.
My bottom line on James Comey is that he's a devout Catholic bucking for Knights of Malta who would sell us out to the Vatican if he saw a chance to but he did some very important, useful things before the election that helped get Donald Trump elected and therefore, I give him a clean sheet. I think he can be saved. I would consider it a privilege to work with James Comey, who, by the way--his term doesn't expire any time soon. I think we should have a Come-to-Jesus meeting with James Comey. We should reinforce him in cleaning out his own house and then we should triple his budget."
I'm quickly losing patience with your child - like reasoning, but I'll spell it out for you anyways. Combining the CIA and NSA in any way, shape, or form is a terrible idea, no matter what you want to call it. "New-CIA" or whatever. Their power would be unimaginable. Elections would no longer matter. It's the exact reason why the CIA - MOSSAD alliance has had so much power, but it would be even exponentially worse than that. If you can't see that, then I can't help you. This is my last reply.
view the rest of the comments →
roundhouse1776 ago
This guy is still CIA loyal, I'm 90% sure. He constantly deflects away from blaming the CIA onto the NSA. It's well known that the CIA and the NSA hate each other. We all know the CIA is rotten and corrupt to the core, anybody who makes excuses for them is definitely a shill. Also why deflect from the Maccoby's? Does it have anything to do with the fact they're Jewish? Could be Israeli controlled disinfo, plus the CIA and Mossad are basically a package deal, they do all this evil shit together.
dFrog ago
He doesn't shy away from dishing dirt on the CIA. I've been listening to every new interview he gives and I've known of him for several years. In part 3 of 3 of his latest VL interview, he says something like, "I'm sick of all these morons saying, 'Once CIA, always CIA.' Please. What about the books I've written with state senators calling for the evisceration of CIA?"
Here's another quote from yesterday: "NSA and CIA are part of the deep state and they're all working for Wall Street. All of them have their sweetheart deals, their offshore bank accounts, their special privileges. You have networks of people who are being blackmailed--not just for pedophilia, but for other indiscretions."
roundhouse1776 ago
You're the same guy that was vigorously defending Seaman, who has no credibility at all left. I guess my instincts are right concerning RDS.
dFrog ago
"Defending" is when you stick up for someone to protect them with no regard for whether or not they are standing on legitimate ground. I don't defend anyone or anything. I say what I think and more often than not, what I think is that other people's logic doesn't hold very well. If I thought either of these men were bullshitters, I would show them no mercy. This is just me disagreeing with you.
Besides, neither Seaman nor Steele have anything to do with me, so nothing I say has any bearing whatsoever on their trustworthiness.
roundhouse1776 ago
Seaman is clearly not what he seems, only the most stubborn and/or blinded people are still denying that. So my point is that if someone still believes in Seaman, also believes in RDS, I like my odds having the opposite opinion on RDS.
dFrog ago
That is still arbitrarily pivoting off of what I think and what I think is irrelevant to both of these men.
Here's another quote from the AMA where he was asked about CIA:
"VERY compartmentalized in one sense, and very open in another.
No. CIA is simply legalized crime on behalf of the White House, Wall Street, Saudi Arabia, the Vatican, the Zionists -- they work for everyone EXCEPT the American public.
War is a profit center that also produces children for pedophiles and organs for marketing.
The Clintons were entirely created by CIA. Bill Clinton, like Barack Obama, has been a Deep State president installed to screw the 99% for the 1%, at the direction of Wall Street."
roundhouse1776 ago
So, knowing all that, why does he then call for the NSA to be dismantled and folded into the CIA? He actually even says NSA HQ should be demolished. So, the CIA is completely corrupt, and not only should continue to exist, but also gain the NSA's massive spying capabilities?
Only a CIA agent could have logic that faulty.
dFrog ago
I think he means that he would like a reformed CIA to expand, not CIA as-is. He says that their power to be corrupt to the bone is based heavily on their ability to blackmail elected leaders and etc.
Here's a quote about James Comey from yesterday:
"Comey is a deep state kind of guy. He's a Lockheed Martin guy, he is a Rothschild guy. For a while there, he was on the board of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank which is the ultimate drug money-laundering, gold-busting, child pedophilia-funding bank in the world. It is THE apple of Rothschild's eye and Comey was a member of the board of directors there, ostensibly to provide ethical oversight.
My bottom line on James Comey is that he's a devout Catholic bucking for Knights of Malta who would sell us out to the Vatican if he saw a chance to but he did some very important, useful things before the election that helped get Donald Trump elected and therefore, I give him a clean sheet. I think he can be saved. I would consider it a privilege to work with James Comey, who, by the way--his term doesn't expire any time soon. I think we should have a Come-to-Jesus meeting with James Comey. We should reinforce him in cleaning out his own house and then we should triple his budget."
roundhouse1776 ago
I'm quickly losing patience with your child - like reasoning, but I'll spell it out for you anyways. Combining the CIA and NSA in any way, shape, or form is a terrible idea, no matter what you want to call it. "New-CIA" or whatever. Their power would be unimaginable. Elections would no longer matter. It's the exact reason why the CIA - MOSSAD alliance has had so much power, but it would be even exponentially worse than that. If you can't see that, then I can't help you. This is my last reply.