He could very well be controlled opposition. He's clearly intelligent enough to understand that rejecting a claim without providing reasons isn't going to cut it. It's possible that he's attempting to control the narrative. We should use him for what he's useful for: he's given personal testimony that there is a child-trafficking unit run by the CIA in Washington DC. Other than that, we should take him for a grain of salt and personally I'm worried that he has influence over Trump's decisions.
I'm glad that he's apparently being ignored for the time being.
If he is somehow still legit, then could he be playing 4D chess, knowing throwing shade on someone will make us look harder? Or could he just be incredibly mistaken? He was mistaken about Trump in the past, as well, and Trump's crew might not like him too much for that reason (he suggested awhile ago that Trump might have been bribed to throw the race).
He doesn't seem very trustworthy. If he really has all the answers from the beginning, he'd be helping us out. He's just doing random interviews repeating what we already know, without offering his "expert investigation skillz" to aide in the fight.
Inclined to agree, he's just trying to get attention. He may well be trying to get that attention for unrelated good intentions (like helping Trump fight the deep state), but that's only speculation and could go either way.
To my knowledge he mentioned the MacCoby's because he has known the daughter for many years - and she's apparently the only person mentioned w/PG that he personally knows.
view the rest of the comments →
nomorepepperoni ago
I take Steele with a VERY large grain of salt. However, this was a response to this question from ""sheasie":
"re: your original post: /r/conspiracy/comments/5x5qd6/weekend_ama_guest_robert_david_steele_friday/defgyu6/
PizzaGate, for all its flaws
re: #pizzagate; what "flaws" ? :) "
Don't agree about Maccoby, but let's not paint this as him dismissing pizzagate--just that it has flaws.
bumbleberries ago
He could very well be controlled opposition. He's clearly intelligent enough to understand that rejecting a claim without providing reasons isn't going to cut it. It's possible that he's attempting to control the narrative. We should use him for what he's useful for: he's given personal testimony that there is a child-trafficking unit run by the CIA in Washington DC. Other than that, we should take him for a grain of salt and personally I'm worried that he has influence over Trump's decisions.
I'm glad that he's apparently being ignored for the time being.
nomorepepperoni ago
If he is somehow still legit, then could he be playing 4D chess, knowing throwing shade on someone will make us look harder? Or could he just be incredibly mistaken? He was mistaken about Trump in the past, as well, and Trump's crew might not like him too much for that reason (he suggested awhile ago that Trump might have been bribed to throw the race).
bumbleberries ago
He doesn't seem very trustworthy. If he really has all the answers from the beginning, he'd be helping us out. He's just doing random interviews repeating what we already know, without offering his "expert investigation skillz" to aide in the fight.
nomorepepperoni ago
Inclined to agree, he's just trying to get attention. He may well be trying to get that attention for unrelated good intentions (like helping Trump fight the deep state), but that's only speculation and could go either way.
Mad_As_Hell ago
Agreed, just thought it was odd he singled out Maccobys when there's a fairly extensive body of evidence to support a connection
notanartist ago
To my knowledge he mentioned the MacCoby's because he has known the daughter for many years - and she's apparently the only person mentioned w/PG that he personally knows.
Singleservename ago
On second thought the Maccobys are a very litigious lot, so their involvement could be a major reason for PG related content takedowns.
Then again are we rookies supposed to shut up about them for this reason?
nomorepepperoni ago
And I agree that part is fishy, particularly with the recent suit.