(pizzagate)
submitted 8.1 years ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath 8.1 years ago
Dude you've been here 3 minutes. See the "Submission Requirements" to the right.
It's not censorship, it's just how we keep from overwhelming the New thread with speculation.
Speculation isn't admissible in court but evidence is.
SenorShip 8.1 years ago
I am a long time user and censorship has been a recurring issue with Pizzagate.
I'm a long time user and have yet to see any censorship outside of keeping the New thread free of speculation which is a GOOD thing. Without rule 4 the real evidence would get lost in the shuffle.
An investigation without speculation???
You shills are a joke and you identify yourselves by being so deliberately obtuse.
Speculation is the wrong word, I apologize. What I'm trying to say is posts need to have some basis in reality.
And I'm not a shill. See for yourself: https://voat.co/user/DarkMath/comments
;-)
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
Dude you've been here 3 minutes. See the "Submission Requirements" to the right.
It's not censorship, it's just how we keep from overwhelming the New thread with speculation.
Speculation isn't admissible in court but evidence is.
SenorShip ago
I am a long time user and censorship has been a recurring issue with Pizzagate.
DarkMath ago
I'm a long time user and have yet to see any censorship outside of keeping the New thread free of speculation which is a GOOD thing. Without rule 4 the real evidence would get lost in the shuffle.
SenorShip ago
An investigation without speculation???
You shills are a joke and you identify yourselves by being so deliberately obtuse.
DarkMath ago
Speculation is the wrong word, I apologize. What I'm trying to say is posts need to have some basis in reality.
And I'm not a shill. See for yourself: https://voat.co/user/DarkMath/comments
;-)