You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

Don't get too excited. There are a lot of problems with that supposed highly secured file download page.

  1. If it's real and files were taken from it it's technically a theft and therefor inadmissible in court.

  2. There isn't any real proof the file download page exists. I personally think it's real but that doesn't matter in a court of law. It has to be proven it was there. If you go to the wayback machine you only see a login page there. Yes the hacker said they got past the login page to take that infamous screen shot. But how do we know it wasn't one of Putin's employees trying to set up CPP.

Don't get me wrong, I think there's ample evidence that some laws were broken with respect to Pizzagate, I'm just saying we can't assume that file download page was real.

RedGreenAlliance ago

Putin's employees? are you serious or being ironic?

You are right we cannot assume anything based on anonymous sources, since we cannot reproduce the same results with our own actions

DarkMath ago

"Putin's employees"......I'm trying to be totally objective with regard to evidence.

That's one of the good parts about having @AreWeSure involved in this investigation. About 20% of what he says is correct and he'd be all over that screenshot of the file download page.

Remember AreWeSure, I'm trying to be objective. I can change my mind based on evidence. You helped us eliminate "warm traffic" and some other evidence that turned out to be totally innocent.

The problem is YOU'RE not being objective. You won't watch Clinton Cash. You won't watch any of the George Webb videos. You don't think a FINANCIAL AUDIT of the Clinton Foundation is justified despite overwhelming evidence of fraud like hiding all ~1000 donors behind the Clinton Guistra Enterprise Partnerships so no one can "go to ground" and find out who's doing what.

crazimal ago

Two awoos sitting in a tree,

K I S S I N G,

Dorkmath and Arewesore,

Get a room!