To play devils advocate, literally, let's assume Seaman's a fraud. How does it hurt to have a fraud working to expose PG? The only entities that benefit from destroying him are his adversaries. Who are his main adversaries for the last three months?
Disinformation. Gatekeeping. What Alex Jones does. Yes it's good hes spreading the general word about PG, but when he spreads false information that people later find out isn't true, it makes the conspiracy seem unsubstantiated and crazy. That goes for the researchers as well. Yea... in the end it doesn't matter. But short term we need enough people on our side to eventually cause a tipping point. This hinders the investigation short term.
Let's assume he gets a few details wrong. If you think that he's the only one, you are mistaken. If you think that the odd mistake diminishes his role as a face and name to the media campaign that is desperately needed, you are mistaken. You are no battlefield tactician. You and your ilk are in fact saboteurs, and everyone who is really interested in justice can smell you a mile away.
![[META] "Body Language: David Seamen" Body language expert analysis on David Seaman (youtube)](/thumbnails/c0/41/c041ba4e-a83e-474a-8146-0a55efc377d3.jpg)
view the rest of the comments →
FuckReddit69 ago
This was deleted within 5 minutes citing rule 3.
This is VERY relevant to PG because it exposes the frauds from the real researchers.
I ask mods to please leave this and let people decide on his authenticity. We can't have frauds as spokesmen for this investigation.
rwb ago
To play devils advocate, literally, let's assume Seaman's a fraud. How does it hurt to have a fraud working to expose PG? The only entities that benefit from destroying him are his adversaries. Who are his main adversaries for the last three months?
FuckReddit69 ago
Disinformation. Gatekeeping. What Alex Jones does. Yes it's good hes spreading the general word about PG, but when he spreads false information that people later find out isn't true, it makes the conspiracy seem unsubstantiated and crazy. That goes for the researchers as well. Yea... in the end it doesn't matter. But short term we need enough people on our side to eventually cause a tipping point. This hinders the investigation short term.
rwb ago
Let's assume he gets a few details wrong. If you think that he's the only one, you are mistaken. If you think that the odd mistake diminishes his role as a face and name to the media campaign that is desperately needed, you are mistaken. You are no battlefield tactician. You and your ilk are in fact saboteurs, and everyone who is really interested in justice can smell you a mile away.
rwb ago
And kindly cite with precision the devastating false information he's spread.