Proof that CPS really does stand for Child PROFIT System they get paid big bonus money for every kid they steal from parents and put into the system. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by MattHelm

Michael Minkoff, is another father who alleges that his children were unjustly taken by CPS. He claims CPS standards for seizing children aren’t just governed by whether they’re abused, but also whether they’re “marketable.” His claim is: "Do you know how many calls it took for someone to show up and take our beautiful white baby twin girls? One call. And CPS took them on the basis of one person’s testimony. And we were assumed guilty from the start. Three months later, the case was dismissed and not a single claim was upheld, yet LA County got three months worth of Federal money out of our kids, and so far, they got it with impunity. In fact, if it hadn’t been for God’s grace and good lawyers, we might have been fighting for much longer to no avail.”

Read the rest at VL

http://victuruslibertas.com/2017/02/how-much-money-does-cps-make-off-our-children/

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

MolochHunter ago

THe crucial Pizzagate related aspect of this is that what nancy schaeffer died for was not just in her state - it is ALL STATES and the legislation that enabled this CPS cash bonuses for stealing kids was wrtten by none other than

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/16/1485775/-What-Hillary-Clinton-s-terrible-foster-care-law-did-to-poor-children-of-color

RodentLord ago

Can you give a tl;dr? The bullet points at the top made me think of the author as a retard and I instinctively clicked out.

MolochHunter ago

it stems from this: imagine if child protection services are given cash bonuses for every child they take away from their parents and put into the foster care system

how do you imagine that incentive might affect their decision making judgement as to which children are in need of their 'protection' ?

RodentLord ago

Ah, I gotcha.

I don't really see why they needed to put the bullets at the top in that case, seems pretty unnecessary.

New_years_day ago

Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA):

  • ASFA encouraged a take-the-child-and-run mentality on the frontlines of child welfare. Thousands more families, overwhelmingly poor and disproportionately families of color, were destroyed by wrongful removal of the children.

  • Instead of reducing the foster care population, ASFA increased it, trapping thousands more children in a system that, according to one major study, churns out walking wounded four times out of five.

  • ASFA effectively turned the child welfare system into the ultimate middle-class entitlement: Step right up and take a poor person’s child for your very own.

  • And when the army of childless yuppies didn’t show up to adopt in anywhere near the numbers predicted, ASFA created a generation of “legal orphans” with no ties to birth parents and no adoptive homes either — probably at least 100,000 more such “legal orphans” than had ASFA not become law.

New_years_day ago

It happened because ASFA was built on a foundation of false premises:

  • False premise #1: Any parent who loses a child to foster care is a sadist, a brute, or a hopeless addict who “puts drugs ahead of the children.”

  • Fact: Far more common are cases in which family poverty is confused with neglect; other cases fall between the extremes. So it’s no wonder that two massive studies involving more than 15,000 typical cases found that children left in their own homes fared better even than comparably-maltreated children placed in foster care.

  • False premise #2: An earlier federal law, passed in 1980, requiring “reasonable efforts” to keep families together supposedly led to some children being left in dangerous homes and other children languishing in foster care.

  • Fact: The law did nothing to change the federal financial incentives that encourage foster care and discourage better alternatives. So the number of children taken from their parents kept right on increasing in almost every year after that law was passed. And though known cases of child abuse peaked in 1993, entries into foster care still kept going up. The reason children languished in foster care was the failure to make reasonable efforts to keep families together.

New_years_day ago

Get the fuck outta here... no way, lol