not censored for me...i got it in 4th position after wikileaks twitter one and a fake one and an other link..
maybe its just because its not active ,at least not much...
If you're not verified then they 100% shouldn't index a twitter handle as real. Wikileaks is verified. If he wanted to say something he could use that platform. If he wanted his own platform verified it would be.
If you're not verified then they 100% shouldn't index a twitter handle as real.
It was there before and is there if twitter julianassange is typed in. Don't give me that "it's because of verification" garbage. The fake JulianAssange_ account is unverified and is on the first page.
common_sense ago
It comes up for me....
Blondmyth ago
Yeah, just been checking through different proxies. I think it's just the UK.
wh0care ago
not censored for me...i got it in 4th position after wikileaks twitter one and a fake one and an other link.. maybe its just because its not active ,at least not much...
(if iam not wrong its this one https://twitter.com/julianassange )
Blondmyth ago
Where are you? I think it's just the UK. I've tried it through proxies in US and France and it shows up.
Stfuretards ago
Stfu retard
http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Julian+assange+twitter
If you're not verified then they 100% shouldn't index a twitter handle as real. Wikileaks is verified. If he wanted to say something he could use that platform. If he wanted his own platform verified it would be.
Not everything is a conspiracy retard.
Blondmyth ago
It was there before and is there if twitter julianassange is typed in. Don't give me that "it's because of verification" garbage. The fake JulianAssange_ account is unverified and is on the first page.
Blondmyth ago
Calm down, CIA. Your link shows nothing, his account isn't there. That's JulianaAssange_, notice the underscore, it's a fake account.
huhhh ago
Say retard again, faggot.
PizzagateBot ago
Hi! I used Google to find related Voat posts using the URL(s) in your post and created the following link(s):