Voaters here to slam David Seaman on behalf of Podesta/Brock now in the awkward position of bashing even this, an expose of one of the most wicked men in politics, and Alefantis' boy toy, a former mental hospital patient.
Brock can be taken down on tax evasion, just like has been done with the mafia. That's the point of this video.
Choosing to bash David seaman rather than going after the DC pedo ring ... I have no words.
I don't care for or trust Seaman's intentions but it's a little weird that all most of the people bashing on him in here have 0 - maybe 20 SCP points in this subverse. I'm not gonna jump on the bandwagon with a bunch of folks who never even participated in this investigation ....
But I still see right thru David S. But I'm not gonna act like him bashing David Brock is a bad thing. I actually think it sucks he took down all his old videos when that's how he got his following and all those Patreon donations to begin with. People say it's because he had to take them down for legal reasons because he mentions GoldMoney in them, but then he puts out another video praising no other than GoldMoney.
I've been participating for months, look at my comments in this thread. That argument is invalid. Look through my other posts if you think I'm a shill. I used to follow him but then I opened my eyes. I provided other actual credible researchers to follow too. I'm all for doing the right thing. But him being so selfish isn't right.
He never told people that he gets 25% commission for people signing up to bit gold and all that shit. He's literally here for the money so he doesn't have to work.
I've been following him since the Occupy days, and he was one of maybe 3 journalists to cover the 2012 NDAA drama. He's the real deal. He was exactly the same then as he is now. He speaks truth to power, he's awkward, doesn't fit in, and is really into Bitcoin. But he's not a shill.
I thought he said in a recent vid that he removed them due to pizzagate related legal threats (?), not Gold Money.
Yeah he's just lazy in his "research" and doesn't get into it. He uses real issues to spark outrage and promote himself (as outlined in his own books) but doesn't buckle down and fully own the topic he's spring-boarding off of. It's whatever.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
Voaters here to slam David Seaman on behalf of Podesta/Brock now in the awkward position of bashing even this, an expose of one of the most wicked men in politics, and Alefantis' boy toy, a former mental hospital patient.
Brock can be taken down on tax evasion, just like has been done with the mafia. That's the point of this video.
Choosing to bash David seaman rather than going after the DC pedo ring ... I have no words.
Sheilaaliens ago
I don't care for or trust Seaman's intentions but it's a little weird that
allmost of the people bashing on him in here have 0 - maybe 20 SCP points in this subverse. I'm not gonna jump on the bandwagon with a bunch of folks who never even participated in this investigation ....But I still see right thru David S. But I'm not gonna act like him bashing David Brock is a bad thing. I actually think it sucks he took down all his old videos when that's how he got his following and all those Patreon donations to begin with. People say it's because he had to take them down for legal reasons because he mentions GoldMoney in them, but then he puts out another video praising no other than GoldMoney.
50hurtz ago
I've been participating for months, look at my comments in this thread. That argument is invalid. Look through my other posts if you think I'm a shill. I used to follow him but then I opened my eyes. I provided other actual credible researchers to follow too. I'm all for doing the right thing. But him being so selfish isn't right. He never told people that he gets 25% commission for people signing up to bit gold and all that shit. He's literally here for the money so he doesn't have to work.
V____Z ago
I've been following him since the Occupy days, and he was one of maybe 3 journalists to cover the 2012 NDAA drama. He's the real deal. He was exactly the same then as he is now. He speaks truth to power, he's awkward, doesn't fit in, and is really into Bitcoin. But he's not a shill.
I thought he said in a recent vid that he removed them due to pizzagate related legal threats (?), not Gold Money.
Sheilaaliens ago
Yeah he's just lazy in his "research" and doesn't get into it. He uses real issues to spark outrage and promote himself (as outlined in his own books) but doesn't buckle down and fully own the topic he's spring-boarding off of. It's whatever.
I heard the legal threats were FROM Gold Money?