South Park - "The Return of Chef." -- was Matt and Trey trying to warn us? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by LA_Trump

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Return_of_Chef

"After leaving South Park to join the "Super Adventure Club", Chef returns and the boys quickly notice that he is acting strangely as he expresses a desire to have sex with them. They go to the Super Adventure Club headquarters and discover that the group is made up of explorers who travel worldwide, molesting children. When the explorers' leader, William P. Connelly, unsuccessfully tries to hypnotize the boys, they realize that the club has brainwashed Chef."

Pizzagate related because Matt and Trey are high profile celebrities who had a fallout with Isaac Hayes over Scientology jokes. Isaac quit the show, so the South Park guys called him a brainwashed child molester part of a secret society.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

MONOLITHicide ago

why is it that south park is considered to be warning us and not just more nods to eachother amongst the illuminated. just because you like the show. actually i was sickened watching the nambla episode that was on the other day having know what occurs. it was a big joke. still enjoy south park but cant believe all off you give this a free pass.

rwb ago

SP is a blot on humanity and a porthole to hell, especially when one considers that it's often watched by children.

drbrontosaurus ago

Hell doesn't exist, nor do holes that lead to such a nonexistent place. And if such things did exist, cartoons wouldn't be part of their mechanism of use.

Stop being a stupid faggot.

rwb ago

Unfortunately, you are wrong on every count. The words heaven and hell are used by believers and non-believers alike, as metaphor, so your certainty that I was speaking in the literal sense is presumptuous. I was using the word in a literal and a metaphorical sense, but you were not smart enough to figure that out, hence your hostility.

When the words heaven or hell are used as metaphor, it means a place that is very good and pleasant, or one that is very awful. The world of incredibly wicked deviancy as referenced constantly on SP leads to hell. I watched an episode about a sex education class and positions. Five were named by the students. Two I knew, the others I had to look up in the urban dictionary. They were unspeakable even among those who are not remotely prudish, and thus have no place as mental programming for children, which is its primary function.

Lastly, I am neither stupid, nor a homosexual.

drbrontosaurus ago

I was using "faggot" as a metaphor for how profoundly stupid you are.

rwb ago

Most of us posting at voat/pizzagate are trying to do any small thing we can to bring the torture, rape, and slaughtering of horrendous numbers of children to an end ASAP. If that was the reason for your presence in this pizzagate forum, I wouldn't have expected such tasteless replies. Most contributors try to maintain some respect for others genuinely interested in helping, even when there is a difference of opinion. If you can't do that, you should find another hobby besides interfering here. Oh, and you are a classic example of what happens to someone's mind when they watch too much South Park.

drbrontosaurus ago

Spreading notions of voodoo magic places is not helping anyone do anything. In fact, it is exactly the kind of bullshit belief these people who are performing rituals involving child rape and murder hold. In the real world cartoons and words can't hurt you, but errant penises in your child's asshole certainly do.

Stop being a fucking moron.

RodentLord ago

Yeah, god, how dumb do you have to be to think things you view as a child effect your development? That's so stupid and flies in the face of all pediatric research. Everyone knows that once you turn 20, your mind gets erased and "adult you" replaces them. Any fond or traumatic memories you have that happen to pertain to your life now are an illusion caused by bias, you just THINK that it's a part of you.

rwb ago

Your knowledge of ritual abuse is seriously lacking. Those performing ritual abuse are guided by belief and worship of entities other than the one you've taken up the challenge to ridicule and disprove. It's clear you are just spoiling to drag this into an argument of theology, but I'm going to decline. I enjoy such discussions when speaking with a clever and friendly adversary, however, I have a standing rule never to engage someone who lacks a good mind.

drbrontosaurus ago

I'd love to go to my grave with zero knowledge of ritual abuse. You are a pedantic piece of shit, to such a degree that I wish you had been sacrificed to Moloch by the pederasts.

Stop being a fucking retarded faggot.

rwb ago

It's interesting that you'd be happy to go to your grave with "zero knowledge of ritual abuse", which implies it wouldn't matter to you if it's actually happening, so long as you were unaware of it. A more normal response would be I'd love to go to my grave knowing that ritual abuse does not or no longer exists. Two different things Johnson. Further, admitting that you wished I'd been sacrificed by the pederasts because I knocked your favorite show does not express much concern for ones fellow man. I don't wish the same for you.

Repetitive profanity with emphasis is surely the most persuasive argument against a Creator. Mind you, I’m a sporting fellow, and because I find you annoying, I’ll go one round on the God question for the benefit of the one or two people who might actually descend down this rabbit hole of yours and mine.

I’ve taken the time to read some of your posts at VOAT, and it’s clear you're not a student of the history of science. I am. Did you know that the ultimate authorities in science and mathematics, the men that built the very foundations of the technical world you inhabit, who gave you that computer in front of you and the ability for man to travel to the moon and understand the workings of the Universe, were all of some kind of religious proclivity? Newton, Einstein, Faraday, Maxwell, Godel, Gauss, Rutherford, Planck, Heisenberg, and Cantor, just to name a few giants, all expressed an awareness of a supreme intelligence behind the Universe, which some call God. Some of the names just mentioned will be unfamiliar to you, but sometimes google is your friend.

So, the question to the casual reader is, with regard to the big question, do I side with Newton and Company, or do I go with some random guy who got his wit and vocabulary from South Park?

RodentLord ago

TBH, science has always been a branch of religious inquiry. It's just that now it's the informal "Church of Atheism" instead of the christian church.

And it makes sense. My beliefs are evolving, but right now they're something to the effective... "The entire universe is the mind of god, and each of us is a cell in it, letting him look at himself". Atoms are mostly empty space, to the extent that you can describe them purely as mathematical relationships and lose nothing.

If we're God trying to understand himself, then it seems perfectly natural that the religious-minded would then want to study math as much as possible.

I have always had a good head for numbers, but never went beyond "practical math" for day-to-day. I'd read or watch an interesting video on upper level maths, and I can get it, but I never sought it out. Realizing and learning how math is literally what "reality" is, whatever it amounts to and realizing that this world isn't physical (de facto proving the "spiritual world" exists, whatever that is, because we're in it right now) has revitalized my interest in it. In a couple of days, I went from thinking "most of the field of mathematics is pointless" to "I need to learn everything I possibly can about math or I'm wasting my life".

I'm not convinced that the Christian God is the answer, in part because how do you decide which God is the Christian God? I'd have to learn to read Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew to really understand (which I haven't discounted the thought of, it may very well be a worthwhile endeavor). Obviously the jews are wrong, because they're the ones pushing atheism/satanism, so any of those three (judaisim/atheism/satanism) is clearly not the right choice (though to be clear, I don't think they believe in a god at all... I think they're living embodiment of what happens when you decide there's no god, so you get to define morality in a vacuum). I have considered that perhaps islam actually is the answer if all relationships are mathematically defined, because it certainly is the best at exponential growth. I'm not positive "maximum growth" is the way religions should be measured, though (but if not, how do you measure it?).

Unlearning is an interesting process. You can dismiss old beliefs as obviously garbage, but filling the void is a challenge.

drbrontosaurus ago

Fuck off. Here's your homework:

Cartoons can't hurt you. Heaven and Hell and Diagon-alley and the Upside Down and all other fictions are precisely that: fiction.

Now, kindly, stop being a stupid faggot.

rwb ago

I'm not sure if I can disengage in demonstrating the error in your worldview until you stop being a potty mouth. The wikipedia articles you cite are all quite entertaining, but have no practical application to my remarks. The question is valid, relevant, and remains, Newton, or guy inordinately devoted to South Park?