Look, if there is ONE shred of actual evidence that Cathy O'Brien's story is true, then I would very much to see it. I refuse to simply believe someone's specific story because I want to, there has to be specific evidence. I do know as a general phenomena that the elites are abusing children, but it does not follow that we should believe every person that comes along with zero evidence to back up their story.
I was there too. What convinced me was a disturbing, graphic photo of the genital mutilation she suffered. It is gross but obviously on an anthropogenic basis. The video is somewhere on YouTube.
You have a point. I happen to believe her and the main reason is there are several other contemporary books that support her story. Cathy's story is believable as a progression from the earlier story of Candy Jones (The CIA's Control of Candy Jones). Whistleblowers of any kind have the problem that they are talking about something that is hidden and protected by the powerful. If true, obviously mind control victims are not allowed to take photographs of their powerful handlers. There are so many of these stories told by seemingly believable people, that I think there is something to it. Further, I think we have to give audience to experiencer testimonies. But I respect your desire for proof.
view the rest of the comments →
PromiseKeeper ago
Look, if there is ONE shred of actual evidence that Cathy O'Brien's story is true, then I would very much to see it. I refuse to simply believe someone's specific story because I want to, there has to be specific evidence. I do know as a general phenomena that the elites are abusing children, but it does not follow that we should believe every person that comes along with zero evidence to back up their story.
equineluvr ago
I was there too. What convinced me was a disturbing, graphic photo of the genital mutilation she suffered. It is gross but obviously on an anthropogenic basis. The video is somewhere on YouTube.
SturdyGal ago
You have a point. I happen to believe her and the main reason is there are several other contemporary books that support her story. Cathy's story is believable as a progression from the earlier story of Candy Jones (The CIA's Control of Candy Jones). Whistleblowers of any kind have the problem that they are talking about something that is hidden and protected by the powerful. If true, obviously mind control victims are not allowed to take photographs of their powerful handlers. There are so many of these stories told by seemingly believable people, that I think there is something to it. Further, I think we have to give audience to experiencer testimonies. But I respect your desire for proof.