You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SayWhatNOWAY ago

Seaman never did his own investigation either! Copied a lot from others!

virtuous_pedophobe ago

He never claimed he did.

His stated goal was to raise awareness of pizzagate.

SayWhatNOWAY ago

Seaman was only capitalizing on the horrible Evil known as pizzagate. I knew the first time I heard him. Seaman never investigated, and he only repeated the info already out there. Milo, is another one. Was they threatened? Possibly Was they getting the word out? Yes, but their motivation was not genuine!

virtuous_pedophobe ago

Pizzagate does not need any more investigators, there are plenty of those.

What Pizzagate needs is high profile people that repeat the (interesting) info out there - using their real name. They should not bore the people but just point the finger to the best and most graphic evidence - which is still the Podesta emails and the JA Instagram pics.

Seaman is doing the most important work - and that is exactly why he is so viciously attacked.

SayWhatNOWAY ago

No! Seaman is attacked cuz he is not genuine! We do not need a snake oil salesman as the spokesperson for this movement!

virtuous_pedophobe ago

First of all you have no rational argument of him not being genuine. (your discredit theory does not with the JA victim allegations- it would work with aliens/ flat earth etc)

Second, Seaman's history does not support your theory (he talked about Hillary's health right before the election, at a time when it did the most harm to HRC)

Third, he is no spokesman and never claimed to be.

Fourth, I do recognize that he is a drama queen, but that does not change the fact that he did red-pill a substancial number of people. That is very important for success.

Fifth, do you realize that you have called EVERY high profile pizzagater a shill here? In your worldview as soon as somebody comes out and uses his real name, he immediately becomes a disinfo agent in your eyes. And that is of course EXACTLY what they want.

Somebody who has come out already is dangerous because he can sue people (you can't sue people when you want to protect your anonymity).

Somebody with a public track record like DS is even more dangerous because he cannot be so easily ignored.

To sum up, your whole argument does not make any sense and you attack exactly those people who can be most effective.

SayWhatNOWAY ago

Dude, do you even hear yourself? None of those I mentioned has said or done anything more than any pizzagate researcher here! They may have been able to reach more people than voat, but they are not any more important!