Joe Bernstein Assassinated Seaman's Character - This is my email back to him (pizzagate)

submitted ago by justice4kidz

WRITE BACK TO JOE BERNSTEIN.
DAVID SEAMAN'S LIFE IS VERY MUCH IN DANGER.

[email protected]

Quite simply, Joe,

We are allowed to prove or disprove any theory we want to under the 1st amendment. It is not "fake news" - what we are all about is research, connecting dots, and putting forth a well-documented theory. No one has said "this definitely has happened" regarding pizzagate And - you miss the entire point about pizzagate. we don't know what or if any child abuse happened THERE, at Comet Pizza. we don't have any footage of any video. What we do have is a very very long list of dots that are connecting, with very strange child porn pics, missing children, and code words that are already known by the FBI to be pedophilia words. Pizzagate is only the tip of iceberg as far as our fight against pedophilia.

We are: well educated, filter facts through our own minds, and have a will to, yes, SAVE THE CHILDREN. that is ALL we want. we want corruption to end. We are not white supremacists. that is very laughable considering people who helped raise my own kid are African American and most of my colleagues are Indian and Asian. very funny indeed.

We are: anti-corruption.

Back off of David Seaman. He's already been poisoned. If he is dead soon we will know, without a doubt, that the pedophilia network called government and hollywood and MSM is all true.

One more thing. Bet you didn't know a ton of child porn really was downloaded from COMET PING PONG??? delivered to the DC police? Oh but DC police chief Newsham also supports child rape (see his past) and stands with Alefantis. Do you research. We have. DC police have done nothing with that info.
[email protected] has sat on it since Dec 5th. But, you didn't know that did you while you assassinated Seaman's character. And did you even look at the band Heavy Breathing or Sex Stains, that play at comet pizza? "all ages welcome"? and the sick Podesta art? did you? if you didn't, then do not assassinate people's GOOD CHARACTER.

Truth Supporter.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

rodental ago

Seaman assassinated Seaman's character.

Antiracist10 ago

How are your responses to those 4 sentences going?

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

rodental ago

?

rodental ago

I already explained to you why that "argument" is ridiculous. Once again, you get me a precise mathematical definition of every english word there and I can maybe help you out. Idiot.

antiracist3 ago

How about you just tell me which words you don't know the meanings of.

"There exists", "some", "thing", "that is changed."

Anyone have any trouble with those words?

"If", "some", "thing", "changes", "then", "that thing", "is changed", "by", "another."

Does anyone here not know the meanings of any of these words?

"If a thing is changed by another", "then either there is an", "infinite regress", "of", "changed changers", "or", "there is an", "unchanged changer."

Anyone have any problem with any of these words?

"An infinite regress", "of changed changers", "is impossible".

Speak up. Any of these words controversial? Feel free to say which ones.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

rodental ago

Those words have generalized meaning in English, but lack the specificity to perform any kind of formal logic operations on them. Also, your domain is undefined, and your operators are as well. I know that this shit gets passed around a lot in the religious community as "proof" to those with no formal education, but that whole argument is quite literally meaningless because it's based on the premise that you can use formal logic on English words representing unspecific concepts.

Anyways, don't take my word for it. Go find a professor of mathematics specializing in formal logic and see what he tells you. Then, after he's told you the exact same thing I have I may accept an apology. Fuck Jesus Christ. Moron.

antiracist3 ago

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

omg look at how far he's taking this schtick! He thinks his ignorance is knowledge!

You can't use logic on English, teehee! What a silly idea! People just communicate in grunts and memes! Even lawyers and philosophers. Grunts and memes. Impossible to mix logic and English. Unpossible.

rodental ago

You can absolutely mix logic and English, just not when you're trying to do a formal proof. The whole point of a proof is to prove something. If 90% of you variables are undefined then by the time you get to the end all you've proven is that you have no idea what you're doing.

In any case, I'm done arguing with you. You lack the education - and likely the intelligence - to understand what you're talking about, and you're also incredibly rude. I hope that as you mature you gain a desire for knowledge, but in honesty I suspect that your mind has been too damaged by the ludicrous teachings of your pathetic dead Christ for you to ever recover. Fuck Jesus Christ, may his teachings rot to dust in the same way his pox addled brain did. Have a good day :)

antiracist3 ago

Wow so edgy!!!!!! Because the prime mover argument means Christianity!!!! Teehee!!! Learned so much in one year of seminary school!!!! Guess at opponent's religion to insult instead of address the argument AT ALL!!!! Clever clever!!!!

Bitch. Give me any math problem you can solve that you think I can't. Then I'll have a go.

AND READ THOSE ENGLISH WORDS AND TELL ME WHICH "VARIABLES ARE UNDEFINED"! YOU WON'T ACCEPT THIS CHALLENGE BECAUSE YOU'RE A DUMB CUNT!

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

Bojangles ago

lel

When someone refuses to put in any effort at all (i.e., simply telling you to fuck off), it's hard to confirm that they're dumb. @rodental, on the other hand..

Antiracist10 ago

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

omg. Look at this guy!!

I give the dude an argument. He dismisses it outright and says literally nothing about it. Then he tells me that he told me already, and that I'm an idiot! Also, he demands mathematical rigor, just like for all of his other beliefs in life! (Sar, is that how I sound when I demand argument over direct revelation?)

It's okay, because he has a year at seminary school.

Also, look, he put argument in quotes, which means the prime mover argument is not an argument!

Rephrase your whole last post in perfect mathematics or it doesn't count.

rodental ago

I did tell you already, idiot, but I will repeat myself: that entire argument is entirely meaningless because you have not defined your variables, your domain, or your operators. Perhaps your Christ-addled brain has trouble with things like understanding words? This is why we want to destroy Christianity: it produces cretins and imbeciles like yourself.

antiracist3 ago

Here's what just happened.

You: I challenge anyone to give an argument for God.

Me: Okay, here.

You: Teehee arguments don't exist! Not enough numbers! My 4 function calculator can't compute your words!

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

antiracist3 ago

Can you give me ANY political or moral belief that you have, and the corresponding mathematical or scientific justification you have for it?

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

Are there any words in there you don't understand?