I suspect you're correct but would you perhaps care to make an argument for your contention? Seems like that might make this less of a topkek shit post.
Tavistock (the cia mothership) have a central control unit where they regulate all of these agencies at times of "crisis" or rather, engineered crisis. Such as 9/11. If you prove the footage of planes was faked, (which is easy to do) you have revealed how each of these agencies of news (aha-haha) was implicit in war crimes. Including the BBC who reported the collapse of building 7 before it happened and which has been successfully used in a court of law to circumvent television license fines.
I apologize for the "Captain Obvious". I've been frustrated lately.
Yes the CIA is behind all this shit, even 9/11. But regarding the planes being faked, I found the evidence for that to be sketchy. My biggest problem with that is the vertical steal girders of WTC 1 and 2 are bent INWARD. An explosion inside WTC 1 an 2 would have obviously bent them outward.
view the rest of the comments →
Pokes ago
I suspect you're correct but would you perhaps care to make an argument for your contention? Seems like that might make this less of a topkek shit post.
DMTco2Melatonin ago
Of course, I would be delighted.
Tavistock (the cia mothership) have a central control unit where they regulate all of these agencies at times of "crisis" or rather, engineered crisis. Such as 9/11. If you prove the footage of planes was faked, (which is easy to do) you have revealed how each of these agencies of news (aha-haha) was implicit in war crimes. Including the BBC who reported the collapse of building 7 before it happened and which has been successfully used in a court of law to circumvent television license fines.
Tralala la la
DarkMath ago
I apologize for the "Captain Obvious". I've been frustrated lately.
Yes the CIA is behind all this shit, even 9/11. But regarding the planes being faked, I found the evidence for that to be sketchy. My biggest problem with that is the vertical steal girders of WTC 1 and 2 are bent INWARD. An explosion inside WTC 1 an 2 would have obviously bent them outward.
How do you resolve that issue?
DMTco2Melatonin ago
It was not thermonuclear, that is how I would resolve it. It was electromagnetic.
DarkMath ago
Sorry. You didn't convince me.
;-)
DMTco2Melatonin ago
Whatever.