Plus, how many people here were actually into the Podesta e-mails beyond that they showed the Hillary lied about the existence of them and the private server?
I just don't follow the grammatical structure of the sentence(?):
Plus, how many people here were actually into the Podesta e-mails beyond that they showed the Hillary lied about the existence of them and the private server?
It's got some mangled grammar and the lack of punctuation also increases the reading difficulty. If you broke it into two sentences it would be clearer. TIA
ETA: In light of the reply below, I am also moving on, although I still am not quite clear on the meaning here.
view the rest of the comments →
Kawksnahch ago
Plus, how many people here were actually into the Podesta e-mails beyond that they showed the Hillary lied about the existence of them and the private server?
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Huh?
Kawksnahch ago
what part's not clear? I will clarify.
ZalesMcMuffin ago
I just don't follow the grammatical structure of the sentence(?):
It's got some mangled grammar and the lack of punctuation also increases the reading difficulty. If you broke it into two sentences it would be clearer. TIA
ETA: In light of the reply below, I am also moving on, although I still am not quite clear on the meaning here.
Kawksnahch ago
It can still be done in one sentence:
Beyond the existence of the e-mails Hillary said didn't exist, recovered from Podesta, how many people were "into" them?
You left out the context about my talking about people getting interested when the pizza code was noticed.
Also, I don't care! If you can break it up into two sentences, because you understand what I'm saying... fuck it.
Mooooooving on.