AZ not only has an issue with immigrant children crossing the border but they have the reputation for removing more children unjustly from families per capita than any other state. Here are several short articles from an online publication that has been covering these stories for more than two years.
It's very difficult to get alternative websites to post these stories because there is a MSM blackout on these cases just as there is with the present situation we have with pizzagate and MSM. Rarely, if ever will MSM cover them, the courts often gag the parents and threaten them with contempt of court if they go public. On occasion one might happen upon a case in on article in MSM but there is never a follow up, the media is gagged akin to what we've seen with Ben Swann and others.
This is exactly what Nancy Schaeffer was exposing, there's a huge financial incentive for the states to legally kidnap children because the entire CPS system is subsidized by the FED mostly through the FED IV-E (social security trust fund, yes the same fund that retirees get their SS check and is going bankrupt) It's a complicated funding structure however the subsidy alone for AZ the last time I looked was a 67% subsidized payment from the FED for all their incurred expenses for that reported year. This includes judges salaries, social workers, therapists, case workers, court appointed attorneys, foster families, etc. etc. etc. So in essence the state was able to employ all these people, their administrative costs, etc while only paying 33% out of the state coffers for the balance to run the operation and employ all these people. This happens in every single state.
The other incentive for the state is "thanks" to Hillary in 1997 she was responsible for crafting the new ASFA which rewarded the states for increasing their adoptions by putting a dollar figure on each child's head IF and only IF the state increased their adoptions over the prior year. No increase = $Zero Bonuses currently are 5k-10k per child depending on their age. So if a state adopts out 1200 children and last year they adopted out 1199 children they will get that bonus for each and every child which results in millions of dollars. These dollars can be used for anything the Gov sees fit and does not have to be put back into child welfare. Is it any wonder that there are currently 427000 children in the system? BTW it's normally families who live within the federal poverty guidelines that are targeted because they don't have the means to hire an atty that can range from 30k-150k to get their child returned.
wow, dude, once again, this needs its own post. Grab an online copy of hillary's ASFA legislation as the primary link to justify the thread, talk first of its national implications, then add your arizona obsevations as an example of the effect in just one state
that fed funding arrangement - its another reason why printing money is insidiously evil. This system could not be supported on the gold standard or money printing strictly limited to population growth
Thanks but I believe Americans don't understand that the majority or removals are legal kidnapping and has been taking place for a long period of time. Most believe that CPS is a good agency that is there to help.....it's not! Granted it doesn't involve the occult, the illuminati, tunnels etc. per se but when Walter Mondale originally created the ACT, before Hillary amended it and made it much worse, he stated that he was fearful that it would turn into child trafficking which it has. After her revisions it's become much worse and it's ripe for pedos to acquire children at no cost to them and get paid for it.
There are hundreds of thousands of children that go missing in the US every year after being taken into the system through CPS with no accountability as to why or traceability as to where. Research it.
view the rest of the comments →
Eastwood350 ago
AZ not only has an issue with immigrant children crossing the border but they have the reputation for removing more children unjustly from families per capita than any other state. Here are several short articles from an online publication that has been covering these stories for more than two years.
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/01/29/15000-cases-of-arizona-child-porn-most-uninvestigated/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2014/11/09/phoenix-childrens-hospital-seizes-8-year-old-boy-because-mother-seeks-second-opinion/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/01/13/arizona-cps-takes-7-children-away-from-parents-after-accident/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/06/05/arizona-continues-record-pace-of-taking-children-out-of-homes-into-state-custody-now-1-of-every-100-children-in-foster-care/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/02/05/arizona-judges-continue-to-threaten-parents-and-restrict-free-speech/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/23/is-arizona-governor-doug-doucey-continuing-practice-of-medical-kidnappings/
https://medicalkidnap.com/2017/01/22/arizona-medical-kidnapping-exposed-in-mainstream-media-report/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2016/07/29/arizona-mom-still-fighting-to-get-her-5-children-back-from-the-state-2-years-after-accident/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/01/13/arizona-cps-takes-7-children-away-from-parents-after-accident/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/05/18/record-number-of-children-seized-by-arizona-cps-sleeping-in-offices/
http://medicalkidnap.com/2014/12/30/medical-kidnapping-billion-dollar-adoption-business/
MolochHunter ago
wow. how about you make that a fresh new post - try to get some links from alternative websites for cross reference.
Is there some structural incentive in the CPS system like in the nancy schaeffer case?
Eastwood350 ago
It's very difficult to get alternative websites to post these stories because there is a MSM blackout on these cases just as there is with the present situation we have with pizzagate and MSM. Rarely, if ever will MSM cover them, the courts often gag the parents and threaten them with contempt of court if they go public. On occasion one might happen upon a case in on article in MSM but there is never a follow up, the media is gagged akin to what we've seen with Ben Swann and others.
This is exactly what Nancy Schaeffer was exposing, there's a huge financial incentive for the states to legally kidnap children because the entire CPS system is subsidized by the FED mostly through the FED IV-E (social security trust fund, yes the same fund that retirees get their SS check and is going bankrupt) It's a complicated funding structure however the subsidy alone for AZ the last time I looked was a 67% subsidized payment from the FED for all their incurred expenses for that reported year. This includes judges salaries, social workers, therapists, case workers, court appointed attorneys, foster families, etc. etc. etc. So in essence the state was able to employ all these people, their administrative costs, etc while only paying 33% out of the state coffers for the balance to run the operation and employ all these people. This happens in every single state.
The other incentive for the state is "thanks" to Hillary in 1997 she was responsible for crafting the new ASFA which rewarded the states for increasing their adoptions by putting a dollar figure on each child's head IF and only IF the state increased their adoptions over the prior year. No increase = $Zero Bonuses currently are 5k-10k per child depending on their age. So if a state adopts out 1200 children and last year they adopted out 1199 children they will get that bonus for each and every child which results in millions of dollars. These dollars can be used for anything the Gov sees fit and does not have to be put back into child welfare. Is it any wonder that there are currently 427000 children in the system? BTW it's normally families who live within the federal poverty guidelines that are targeted because they don't have the means to hire an atty that can range from 30k-150k to get their child returned.
MolochHunter ago
wow, dude, once again, this needs its own post. Grab an online copy of hillary's ASFA legislation as the primary link to justify the thread, talk first of its national implications, then add your arizona obsevations as an example of the effect in just one state
that fed funding arrangement - its another reason why printing money is insidiously evil. This system could not be supported on the gold standard or money printing strictly limited to population growth
Eastwood350 ago
Thanks but I believe Americans don't understand that the majority or removals are legal kidnapping and has been taking place for a long period of time. Most believe that CPS is a good agency that is there to help.....it's not! Granted it doesn't involve the occult, the illuminati, tunnels etc. per se but when Walter Mondale originally created the ACT, before Hillary amended it and made it much worse, he stated that he was fearful that it would turn into child trafficking which it has. After her revisions it's become much worse and it's ripe for pedos to acquire children at no cost to them and get paid for it.
Fightforright ago
There are hundreds of thousands of children that go missing in the US every year after being taken into the system through CPS with no accountability as to why or traceability as to where. Research it.