I still don't buy this. If he were controled opposition he would have actually spoken out on PIZZAGATE so they could win a lawsuit and make an example of him. Alex Jones did not start this and did not point fingers at comet. If that's controled opposition they need better writers. Glen beck was controlled opposition. And that's exactly what it looks like. He had no original ideas and yet became the mainstream "voice" of the "crazy right wing". Then thr moment they needed him to flip he did and attempted to drain votes from trump with an irrational ferver and no logical basis. That's what controlled opposition is for. Build an audience. Feed the audience with what they want to hear so they trust you and then when the timing is right tell them they must vote for the enemy because of thier "moral obligation". I could be wrong but I've seen no flip flopping from Alex. Not saying he's always right or even someone to look up to (that's a different discusión) but he's been consistent for a long ass time and if he was willing to work for the man I see no logical reason they would have needed to create Glen Beck. He was absolutely thier Alex Jones back up plan. Jones won't flip for money? Ok. We'll make a new Jones. Controled opposition never walks lightly when confronting the enemy because they are the enemy. Their job is to ramp up hatred and slip in lies. If Alex Jones was controled PIZZAGATE would have been the PERFECT opportunity to fully discredit him. It's so clear that was their plan but since he wouldn't play ball they just went ahead with thier script anyway and have been trying to make it make sense. But it doesn't and we know that. Controled opposition is meant to convert the enemy through manipulation or make them look crazy through false information. Glen Beck has done both those things. Alex may be a bit of clown at times but his audience is neither being converted or discredited. And yet they are clearly trying like hell to do both. This seems proof enough to me that Alex is not cooperating with thier planned narrative. Alright I'm done. What am I missing? Why should we think is controled? And I'm really asking because it's important. Making people believe he is controled will only cause apathy when he is attacked. But I think it's clear we need anything but apathy on this. He did NOT start PIZZAGATE and he did NOT slander comet pizza. Holding him accountable for these things in a court of law will establish horendouse precedents. So... as I see it even if he is controled it would be for the purpose of establishing these terrible court presidents and that we can not let happen no matter who he is.