No one is claiming that this is proof of anything. It's what is called a 'lead' — some piece of information that one should take note of because it may lead to more substantial information. Leads are worth pursuing because they can often lead to detailed information and this in turn can sometimes lead to new proof and evidence.

We shouldn't discourage people from sharing potential leads because other people may be interested in pursuing them further. That is the nature of a crowdsourced investigation. It is fit and proper for someone to report potentially useful information.

People who say "THAT PROVES NOTHING" are being idiotic. They don't understand how evidence is gathered. When you're accumulating information about something like this, you keep track of small details that ignorant people would look at and say, "This isn't smoking-gun evidence for anything; therefore it must be discarded".

Idiots will also focus on this or that detail in a larger mass of evidence, and consider it in isolation from a wider pattern of information, and then say, "THAT ALONE PROVES NOTHING, SO PIZZAGATE MUST BE FALSE".

Then you have a few ignoramuses who get all discouraged about Pedogate research just because a few leads never turned out to be very fruitful — and this in spite of the overwhelming mass of evidence already gathered in connection to Pedogate. The moment that this or that piece of information doesn't bear any fruit , these people seem to forget about the huge amount of evidence and proof that has already been firmly established. Such people are either very forgetful, or they are shills.

Bottom line: Pizzagate has already been proven. We're now in the process of filling in details.