While this comes to no surprise to anyone here, because Bill is indeed a rapist, it is a very compelling argument to make towards people believing the Clintons are decent human beings. This is because, Info Wars has a very large audience and thus if Bill was innocent, he could easily sue Alex Jones for millions, have the mainstream media push the lawsuit front and center, and LITERALLY cause Info Wars to be shut down overnight.
To illustrate this further, the popular YouTuber Mark Dice got his name quickly removed the from The Guardian's article outlining him as part of the "Alt-Right", by threatening to sue them for defamation: https://youtu.be/TOb81oGidj0?t=4m33s. So it is clear that even a large-scale news outlet would cave to a YouTuber.
Thus this alone is a strong argument to make that Bill Clinton is indeed a rapist, without even needing to deal with any of the specifics. Another reason might just be that the Clintons know they will be digging up an early grave if they personally go after Alex Jones, as he alluded to in his Reddit AMA yesterday (https://youtu.be/K33Ee9m5xlw?t=7s)) in which he alluded to having "1000 times worse" material he hasn't exposed yet...
Let me know what you think!
view the rest of the comments →
AreWeSure ago
This is a terrible argument. The libel bar for public officials, especially a president is very, very high. To point where it's not worth it to sue.
Secondly, Jones could very well say it's his opinion, and opinions are protected speech.
And given that Jones holds many, many opinions that no sane person shares, the court could rule that no defamation occurred because no reasonable person would believe the opinion of Alex Jones matters.
Mrs_Ogynist01 ago
Wrong. First Lady Melania Trump just sued (& won) a libel case against a blogger for calling her a prostitute.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/melania-trump-settles-lawsuit-against-9774769.amp
He doesn't sue because he's a rapist.
matheasysolutions ago
yup.