While this comes to no surprise to anyone here, because Bill is indeed a rapist, it is a very compelling argument to make towards people believing the Clintons are decent human beings. This is because, Info Wars has a very large audience and thus if Bill was innocent, he could easily sue Alex Jones for millions, have the mainstream media push the lawsuit front and center, and LITERALLY cause Info Wars to be shut down overnight.
To illustrate this further, the popular YouTuber Mark Dice got his name quickly removed the from The Guardian's article outlining him as part of the "Alt-Right", by threatening to sue them for defamation: https://youtu.be/TOb81oGidj0?t=4m33s. So it is clear that even a large-scale news outlet would cave to a YouTuber.
Thus this alone is a strong argument to make that Bill Clinton is indeed a rapist, without even needing to deal with any of the specifics. Another reason might just be that the Clintons know they will be digging up an early grave if they personally go after Alex Jones, as he alluded to in his Reddit AMA yesterday (https://youtu.be/K33Ee9m5xlw?t=7s)) in which he alluded to having "1000 times worse" material he hasn't exposed yet...
Let me know what you think!
view the rest of the comments →
Diogenes_The_Cynic ago
No. If you're wealthy and powerful, trying to fight a literal conspiracy theorist means you will lose face for acknowledging them.
matheasysolutions ago
infowars would be shut down if bill sued them (and was innocent)...
Diogenes_The_Cynic ago
Responding to them gives infowars legitimacy, so the thinking goes.
matheasysolutions ago
they would have been shut down years ago, so doesn't matter if they gain "legitimacy", they would be gone.
Also, as I explained in my earlier comment above somewhere: