John Podesta interview -- fighting for his life? Did he and Weiner do it deliberately? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by gumshoe_mob

The Interview Feb 20, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD2pwatfQg4

Lynn de Rothschild (close friend of Hillary) calling John Podesta a "loser" after this interview -- https://twitter.com/LdeRothschild/status/834293947690262528 -- brings up the subject of him being disposable by the powers-that-be. His recent interview was pathetic, desperately trying to cover his ass and calling on media and internet companies to stop the "fake news" conspirators.

We know that at one of the "spirit" gatherings Miss Queen Abramavich wrote on the wall in blood -- "take a sharp knife and cut deeply into the middle finger of your left hand - eat the pain" -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9ys-Lfu4Sc -- and Podesta appearing in a picture with a cut on his hand. Would this be some punishment for a misdeed?

And -- if he was starting to take the heat from Hillary during the campaign, was the easily hacked email account his own way of covering his ass so that they all would go down with him if anything happened to him?

Why are some key emails missing during the kidnapping of Madeleine McCann? Why are there not emails about his lobbying for Russia? Why is he now betraying the Russians by blaming Hillary's loss on them? Did he scrap his lobbying job all of a sudden? Or did he know they would do it? Did he know someone would do it? Is there an arrangement? Is he deflecting the wrath of Hillary with this interview? Is he fighting for his life?

Hillary Clinton was losing big time. Her crowds were non-existent and Trumps were huge stadiums. When they had to start cheating to beat Bernie Sanders in the primaries -- https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/2016/03/03/sane-progressive-sanders-needs-to-address-voter-fraud-now/ -- the horrible truth was creeping into their reality. Trump would protect his reputation, on which he had built his empire. His name alone got bank loans. He would not be corrupted.

And also, was Anthony Weiner's indiscretion deliberate, stupidly posting nude pictures he already had gotten caught for -- in order to activate his "insurance" files? If Weiner, Huma, and/or Podesta thought the Clintons were all going down under the RICO act, they might have all deliberately made the first move to make sure that the rest of the Clinton mafia went right down with them.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

lostinthevalley ago

I'm not following the logic of Podesta's purposely letting the emails be hacked so they would all go down with him. Please elaborate.

gumshoe_mob ago

OK. So, Hillary had set it up big time to ensure she got nominated. She set up the DNC, got the contributors to donate to the states so that she could siphon off the money to her own campaign. Then we see talk in the emails about creating Pied Pipers that will collect interest in the election and then would drop out and shift that interest to her. Bernie may have been a pied piper, made a deal, etc etc. Bernie was small potatoes, so they let him run under the Democrat ticket, with the general idea that he would eventually drop out. Things went crazy and Bernie began to win.

Hillary (known for her temper when out of reach of the camera) may have begun to rant and rave. Someone did something wrong. Podesta was her campaign manager so he may have taken the brunt of it. So, he gets careless with his emails. He deletes any Russia emails (being a paid lobbyist for them he surely would have some) and tells Russia to hack him. Hiding and controlling scandal is one thing -- creating a global empire through WWIII is another. Who knows what kind of thing he might have found out about the ambitions of Hillary Clinton.

Anthony Weiner may have taken the brunt, as well. Huma and Hillary were inseparable, and there was no real marriage. Who knows if it wasn't even an arranged marriage to give Huma respectability before Hillary became President. Don't you think it is just a bit stupid to send pictures of yourself to young girls? It isn't the same as actually having sex like Bill Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky, but it would be scandalous.

What if the people around her know the truth --- that she is flipping frikking insane and has no moral backbone whatsoever. So, the only way to expose such a thing is to do it vicariously. After all, there may still be people around those parts that actually love our country more than they love Hillary and Billy Boy Clinton.