I think this may have been a mistake to put Milo in a Pedophile related spotlight. This only gives him the attention.
What I believe they have done, is put someone who the left views as "deplorable", and now that they labeled him a pedophile, this makes them angrier. This, I think, is a great place to have Milo. He could now openly talk about Pedogate, not from a Trump's "puppet" position, but from now, a victim's perspective.
What he should do, is start having victims of pedophilia, human trafficking, etc, on to talk about their story. He could turn this attempt to de-legitimize him, and eventually Breitbart/Bannon/Trump, into something. If Fox news gave him 20 minutes to speak on the issue, maybe in person with Hannity, or someone else, he could build a massive anti-pedo platform. He wouldn't even need to name anyone, but just the action of human trafficking, sex trafficking, pedophilia, and CP.
In Chess, what the media is doing now, is called a stupid fucking move.
What I'm worried about is now that Milo was "outed" by MSM as a pedophile and then said he was a victim, what is going to happen when all of these other people start getting arrested and then claim they were just a victim as well? I hope that's not something the MSM could use to their advantage.
We all know Papa Bush was diddling little Bushes so it just seems like something those types of people could use as an excuse.
There is a difference between a child having intercourse with an adult(victim), and an adult having sex with a child (pedophile).
Now, unless you're in Mike Rowe's position, where you're 22, at a bar, and meet a girl there, and go home and are recorded having sex with her... and she turns out to be 16, but with a fake ID, I think in this case, Rowe would be a victim.
It's all circumstantial really.... But what Hollywood is doing to child stars, or child trafficking, I can't see how the adults are in any way victims.
I totally agree with you. The victim mentality of it was done to me so I did it someone else is ridiculous to me. I just wouldn't put anything past these people.
It was, in my opinion, a VERY, poor, desperate decision to attack Milo. They shouldn't be giving him attention if they don't want people to be aware of him. Discrediting him with this poor, low energy attempt, is a version of "slut shaming", except 100x worse, as he was an actual victim. What the Antifa-Beta-Cucks and Pr'aggressives in Berkeley did only put him in the spotlight.
What they've done is greenlit his platform to hand our redpills to way more people, and expose actual Pedophiles.
view the rest of the comments →
fetuspizza ago
I think this may have been a mistake to put Milo in a Pedophile related spotlight. This only gives him the attention.
What I believe they have done, is put someone who the left views as "deplorable", and now that they labeled him a pedophile, this makes them angrier. This, I think, is a great place to have Milo. He could now openly talk about Pedogate, not from a Trump's "puppet" position, but from now, a victim's perspective.
What he should do, is start having victims of pedophilia, human trafficking, etc, on to talk about their story. He could turn this attempt to de-legitimize him, and eventually Breitbart/Bannon/Trump, into something. If Fox news gave him 20 minutes to speak on the issue, maybe in person with Hannity, or someone else, he could build a massive anti-pedo platform. He wouldn't even need to name anyone, but just the action of human trafficking, sex trafficking, pedophilia, and CP.
In Chess, what the media is doing now, is called a stupid fucking move.
planetswillalign ago
I hope that this all works out in our favor.
What I'm worried about is now that Milo was "outed" by MSM as a pedophile and then said he was a victim, what is going to happen when all of these other people start getting arrested and then claim they were just a victim as well? I hope that's not something the MSM could use to their advantage.
We all know Papa Bush was diddling little Bushes so it just seems like something those types of people could use as an excuse.
fetuspizza ago
There is a difference between a child having intercourse with an adult(victim), and an adult having sex with a child (pedophile).
Now, unless you're in Mike Rowe's position, where you're 22, at a bar, and meet a girl there, and go home and are recorded having sex with her... and she turns out to be 16, but with a fake ID, I think in this case, Rowe would be a victim.
It's all circumstantial really.... But what Hollywood is doing to child stars, or child trafficking, I can't see how the adults are in any way victims.
planetswillalign ago
I totally agree with you. The victim mentality of it was done to me so I did it someone else is ridiculous to me. I just wouldn't put anything past these people.
fetuspizza ago
It was, in my opinion, a VERY, poor, desperate decision to attack Milo. They shouldn't be giving him attention if they don't want people to be aware of him. Discrediting him with this poor, low energy attempt, is a version of "slut shaming", except 100x worse, as he was an actual victim. What the Antifa-Beta-Cucks and Pr'aggressives in Berkeley did only put him in the spotlight.
What they've done is greenlit his platform to hand our redpills to way more people, and expose actual Pedophiles.
Good.