OK millenniumfalcon, this in no way breaks rule one, Subverse is flooded with shit again and you deleted a relevant post about popular media personality, saying that pizzagate isn't objective. I'm also making a comparison against a non objective conspiracy that the opposition is comparing us to. I'm very busy with a business to run and don't appreciate having to repost.
Are we trump apologists? Do pizzagate mold the narrative to fit the answer we want? That's a common claim made about conspiracy theories and theorists. This video with Stefan taking to a flat earth believer is a great example of the kind of flawed arguments conspiracy theorists are known and stereotyped for: https://youtu.be/hsOz_J6tJVUYouTube
Lionel talks about pizzagate in this vid twice past tense https://youtu.be/5GxPUAcGPv8YouTube
In a past profession I was a sort of professional contrarianistic skeptic involved in economics and markets and studied statistics, probabilities, fallacy, logic, reasoning, scientific methods of discovery, deduction, etc... As such I pride myself in keeping and open mind, being skeptical, not being duped, persuaded in my opinions, etc... This is much easier to do when you stick to more concrete and absolute matters with fewer variables. Making any sort prediction about any outcome Pizzagate related is akin to long range weather forecasting. There are just so many players with so much at stake. I am very distrustful of just about everyone involved. Just about the only thing I trust is the original emails. I believe they were genuine, Podesta has had plenty of opportunities to deny their credibility and he never has, which if they were tampered with he most certainly would have said so. I am very confident that what we think we're seeing here is what it is, these are bad people, doing bad things. I have no doubt about that. We're not immune to wishful thinking, like with the Worldcorpo stuff. We're mostly powerless to prove the case without access to more personal records and information. I don't know that this will ever be properly investigated. We just have to hope that someone will leak something. Or that we get a lucky break and are able to connect the dots. Just because we're not able to do that, doesn't mean that our 'suspicions' and hunches are unfounded. By that argument all unproven criminal cases should be dropped.
I don't know if we're going to get any help from Trump on this or not, this is just so big and deep. But I'm hopeful, and convinced, and not going to let anyone who doesn't really know anything about it get me down because the arguments being made here for the most part are not apologist our self fulfilling.
view the rest of the comments →
listentoreason2017 ago
Agreed that the only undisputed part of this is the emails which are demonstrably true. Also the vast, vast majority of social media pictures.
The part where people here don't understand how other people view it is that the rest of it is based on interpretation (of emails and linkages between organizations and peoples) or inferring (the social media pictures). Everyone can insist otherwise, but there is no smoking gun as of yet.
There are inferences based on that which is true (Wikileaks emails and social media pictures) but there are no photos or videos of anyone abusing children. I don't think I've read of any victims of JA or JP coming forward and having their story corroborated. At least to my knowledge, I don't know of anyone of stature accusing Podesta of molestation before pizzagate. Breitbart said he covering up for ACORN who was abusing children. Damning in light of other things but again, not a smoking gun.
People here shouldn't just dismiss people's skepticism of pizzagate with 'sheeple' or 'idiots who haven't looked at the evidence'. The evidence proposed requires inferences and interpretation. People should keep in mind that a lot of people do not instantly suspect someone of pedophilia based on pictures or weird comments. People need things presented coherently based on a sturdy footing otherwise it strains their imagination.
Just my two cents and if there is evidence of that nature, send it my way.