This is suspicious, the reasons for voat being comprimised are unfounded (he broke rule 4), new site looks like a honeypot up and protests forcing investigators into the light. Don't blindly trust him just because he has been with voat for a while since he could be a deep cover psyop. Proceed With Caution
Looser rules are in /v/pizzagatewhatever. If we had looser rules in pizzagate it would be open season for shills and inexperienced but eager spammy pg investigators. I personally like how the mods keep quality control using (mostly) clear cut rules rather then trusting based on names. Even as a person who has had one of my (what I thought) well structured pg post deleted for rule violations I appreciate how it works
I agree with rule one, but have seen stuff deleted many time because it doesn't provide a source. For instance a rally cry. Deleted, no source. But there is no source for rally cries.. duh the OP is the source. There is a lot of talk about leaving this platform.
Rally cries can also easily be used to slide topics off the front page. As annoying and restrictive as they are, structure was needed. Too many people on Voat are not familiar enough with how it works to click past crap to find real info so multiple, incomplete threads just junk up the research. I find it tremendously frustrating but they have limited tools.
I got discouraged a while ago, that these low hanging fruit busts are just to pacify the masses. I'm TRYING to be patient with Sessions in his new AG position. And it could be that Trump needs to break the evil cabal carefully, so as not to bring down our whole government in the process. I think what really convinced me of the gigantic force we are up against, was when I saw the videos that proved to me that Hannity was in on FAKING that he was sitting in the same room with Assange for their interview. Then either last night or tonight, Hannity went off on his show, lecturing the MSM about spreading FAKE NEWS, and not being HONEST to the viewers. Seriously?? Some people refuse to believe he'd do that, but if he or his family were threatened, he'd have no choice.
I do agree that voat has too many paid shills. AND I really do believe as hard as you investigators have worked for months, people can only do so much research and documenting, without seeing some real crackdowns.
I'm not sure if it's possible, but maybe more emphasis should be placed on getting a couple of the legitimate well known people to lead the charge? (James Woods, Scott Baio, Laura Ingraham, Bo Dietl, Rosie (if she's not compromised). Or possibly somehow getting SOME concrete direction from someone in LE, on WHAT to do next??? Just some ideas, cuz I'm at a loss, but just like many outwitted the MSM who was LYING about HRC being ahead in the polls up until the results came in, maybe it could be done again? As big as the whole PG issue is, I do agree with the OP that a PLAN needs to be figured out. But I would suggest (especially for newbies) always be careful and cautious, even for this cause.
Being vigilant is the first thing you learn as a self appointed voat investigator. The shills on Voat are fairly low level so as long as we continue to downvoat/ignore distractions and be skeptical of everything I think we should be fine. The only thing that might divide us is getting impatient because arrests arn't happening as quickly as we had hoped. I think its going to be a battle of attrition which will require patience as the people slowly wake up to this. Maybe protests will be required when we follow the smoke and aquire fire that the MSM wont acknoledge, but if we protest before then I think we will give credit to MSM CTR stories.
view the rest of the comments →
Chatman ago
This is suspicious, the reasons for voat being comprimised are unfounded (he broke rule 4), new site looks like a honeypot up and protests forcing investigators into the light. Don't blindly trust him just because he has been with voat for a while since he could be a deep cover psyop. Proceed With Caution
Fateswebb ago
New site? What new site? They haven't even made it yet...
Chatman ago
I mean how his site is invite only & how he is going to recruit talented investigators from voat. Smells like a honeypot to me
Fateswebb ago
Yeah, I think we just need looser rules, and strict control over mods, but this place may be unfixable.
Chatman ago
Looser rules are in /v/pizzagatewhatever. If we had looser rules in pizzagate it would be open season for shills and inexperienced but eager spammy pg investigators. I personally like how the mods keep quality control using (mostly) clear cut rules rather then trusting based on names. Even as a person who has had one of my (what I thought) well structured pg post deleted for rule violations I appreciate how it works
Fateswebb ago
I agree with rule one, but have seen stuff deleted many time because it doesn't provide a source. For instance a rally cry. Deleted, no source. But there is no source for rally cries.. duh the OP is the source. There is a lot of talk about leaving this platform.
Melitica ago
Rally cries can also easily be used to slide topics off the front page. As annoying and restrictive as they are, structure was needed. Too many people on Voat are not familiar enough with how it works to click past crap to find real info so multiple, incomplete threads just junk up the research. I find it tremendously frustrating but they have limited tools.
RecycledUser ago
I tend to agree with you, on the honeypot idea.
I got discouraged a while ago, that these low hanging fruit busts are just to pacify the masses. I'm TRYING to be patient with Sessions in his new AG position. And it could be that Trump needs to break the evil cabal carefully, so as not to bring down our whole government in the process. I think what really convinced me of the gigantic force we are up against, was when I saw the videos that proved to me that Hannity was in on FAKING that he was sitting in the same room with Assange for their interview. Then either last night or tonight, Hannity went off on his show, lecturing the MSM about spreading FAKE NEWS, and not being HONEST to the viewers. Seriously?? Some people refuse to believe he'd do that, but if he or his family were threatened, he'd have no choice.
I do agree that voat has too many paid shills. AND I really do believe as hard as you investigators have worked for months, people can only do so much research and documenting, without seeing some real crackdowns.
I'm not sure if it's possible, but maybe more emphasis should be placed on getting a couple of the legitimate well known people to lead the charge? (James Woods, Scott Baio, Laura Ingraham, Bo Dietl, Rosie (if she's not compromised). Or possibly somehow getting SOME concrete direction from someone in LE, on WHAT to do next??? Just some ideas, cuz I'm at a loss, but just like many outwitted the MSM who was LYING about HRC being ahead in the polls up until the results came in, maybe it could be done again? As big as the whole PG issue is, I do agree with the OP that a PLAN needs to be figured out. But I would suggest (especially for newbies) always be careful and cautious, even for this cause.
Chatman ago
Being vigilant is the first thing you learn as a self appointed voat investigator. The shills on Voat are fairly low level so as long as we continue to downvoat/ignore distractions and be skeptical of everything I think we should be fine. The only thing that might divide us is getting impatient because arrests arn't happening as quickly as we had hoped. I think its going to be a battle of attrition which will require patience as the people slowly wake up to this. Maybe protests will be required when we follow the smoke and aquire fire that the MSM wont acknoledge, but if we protest before then I think we will give credit to MSM CTR stories.
BackAgain ago
Dude the Assange Hannity interview is not fake lol
People try to say "He wasn't even looking at him" when he was
Then they say "Assange was standing!" maybe he was just ..........sitting on a stool like many people do in interviews
RecycledUser ago
Sorry it was fake.