I agree. I even think the videos can be easily fabricated. What folks forget is that what you see and what you hear don't necessarily have to be the same thing. The video could be from one source, but it's so vague it's almost meaningless without the context of the audio. The audio could be from another source, or more likely, 2 different sources. Anyone with a taste for the macabre and a bit of video and audio editing skills could make a video that'll make you want to contact the fbi.
By that reasoning, all video evidence ever collected, or ever will be collected, is invalid, which is preposterous. There are ways to discern whether digital information has been manipulated or fabricated. Sometimes the methods are analytical, and other times they are qualitative, based on experience and intuition. My intuition is telling me something about these videos.
view the rest of the comments →
surgeson ago
I agree. I even think the videos can be easily fabricated. What folks forget is that what you see and what you hear don't necessarily have to be the same thing. The video could be from one source, but it's so vague it's almost meaningless without the context of the audio. The audio could be from another source, or more likely, 2 different sources. Anyone with a taste for the macabre and a bit of video and audio editing skills could make a video that'll make you want to contact the fbi.
rwb ago
By that reasoning, all video evidence ever collected, or ever will be collected, is invalid, which is preposterous. There are ways to discern whether digital information has been manipulated or fabricated. Sometimes the methods are analytical, and other times they are qualitative, based on experience and intuition. My intuition is telling me something about these videos.
surgeson ago
My intuition is telling me something very different.