I'll keep this short and sweet. We all know Milo is a pawn, being catapulted by known shills like Bill Maher, CNN, and other mainstream.. In another part of the act, an old video emerged of Milo defending pedophilia. In it he tries to legally blur the lines between child-sex, saying "Pedophilia is defined as sexual attraction to a prepubecent person". He claims around 12 or 13 years old you have functioning sexual organs and the child can benefit from sex with an Adult...
Never the less, here is the conversation that is career-ending and shines a light on Milo's pedophile-like mind.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD064D-yr44 Milo starts at 2:45
-
"we're talking about 13 to 25, 13 to 28. These things do happens perfectly consensual" - 3:13 (referring to age and sex)
-
"there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age" - 10:58
-
"and you know what, I'm grateful for Father Michael, I wouldn't give nearly such good head if it wasn't for him" - 11:50
Milo goes on to advocate sex with children as long as they have "functioning sexual organs". He claims young children can severly benefit from these sexual relationships with adults, as many youngsters are confused in the 'coming of age' period of life. He claims Homosexuals specifically can benefit from young boy-to-adult man sex, because of the "confusing nature of homosexuality"... It's clear this man is a deep-down Pedo. But it begs the question, why was he catapulted to such success in the first place?
Edit Holy cow, look at the downvoats pouring in. The shill bot army seems to be on alert. All I did was shine a light on this old livestream. If you don't think they have even more dirt than this you're silly... Someone on here seems to fear the real reason Milo is done & officially labelled a Pedophile.
view the rest of the comments →
Sh0ts ago
I'm not sure how to put this but I feel like I should chime in as a "left side of things" person. First of all I have to say I disagree with the assertion that Milo made in regards to someone as young as 13 being able to give consent. No someone 13 does not have the mental maturation to give consent to have sexual contact with much older people. That said I do see the gray area that I suspect he was trying to convey. In some places in the world even in our own country the age of consent is very low by my standards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States
so 16 in parts of the country. I personally think 18 should be the cut off but hey that's me.
I also know quite a few adults (gay and strait) that will admit to finding teenagers attractive. Lets be real some of them look much older than they are.
My point is there are a load of double standards out there and case specific things that muddy the waters. At the end of the day we have to draw a line someplace and that can create situations that are complicated.
I have a friend who was convicted of statutory for having a relationship with a 16 year old while he was 21. I think thats not okay personally but its a weird situations because the girl never had a problem with it and it was her father that found out and pressed charges. He and her remain friends to this day. In some other states this would not have been a crime. Do you guys get what I am saying?
I also think this kind of thing is a bigger deal in the gay community and again sometimes the lines are a little blurry.
There are also individuals that are cognitively speaking older than others their age. This does not give adults the right to molest them but its a fact. I know when I was in my early 20s (and I suspect this is still an issue) it was pretty common for underage girls to try and lie about their age. So dating could be a bit of a mine field.
Personally I have never been a fan of this Milo guy and I don't care that he is being taken down. It is very obviously however politically motivated.