This will show you all you need to know on why Milo resigned, and why this "new" evidence isn't really new. This was all orchestrated. And frankly Milo is a pedophile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD064D-yr44
So we're here researching Clinton and Epstein's horrific nature. You're telling me if it turned out there was solid proof of Clinton having sex with a 13 year old that you wouldn't pull the Pedophile card? Come on. Any sane person knows sex with a 13 year old is not okay, and only a pedophile would morally accept or encourage sex from someone that just reached puberty.
This is a complicated issue because there is so much emotion wrapped around it...what gets lost in the discussion is a true pedophile vs. someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor that is under the legal age of consent. What we are likely to see soon are videos of someone holding down a screaming or drugged child <10 years old and raping them...that is pedophilia, and nowhere close to what Milo was talking about.
When you are talking minors who are post-pubescent but not of the legal age of consent, that is where everyone gets their panties in a knot. The issue is not that you are abhorrent because you see children and become sexually aroused (and yes, those people are truly evil)...because post-pubescent minors are of reproductive age but are not yet mentally or emotionally ready to have sexual relationships, either with adults or peers. I was 5'10', 190 pounds and muscular as a 13 year old...a young teenager's mind in an adult body.
This is why the consent laws aimed at post-pubescent minors are essentially about addressing coercion or abuse of power...in other words, that 16 year old girl with big boobs may look 18, but she's not, and while you would not be abnormal for thinking she looks good naked, you would still be abusing her by being an adult and having sex with someone who is not mentally or emotionally mature enough to consent to that relationship. Another example of this, is most states have laws that teachers cannot have sex with their students, even if they are over the age of 18...and why is that? It is the coercion and abuse of power thing.
The point is that attraction to post-pubescent females or males is normal, but the age of consent laws directed at this age group are designed to protect immature minors in adult bodies from consenting into sexual relationships that they are not yet capable of consenting. Hence the term "statutory rape". And that is the problem I have with loosely calling Milo a pedophile...he is not a pedophile because he is not attracted to pre-pubescent boys. Did you miss the part where he said the age of consent laws were about right? His views on young male/older male relationships are warped because he was statutorily raped. In his mind, he consented and it felt good at the time...but in reality he was taken advantage of by a priest when he was too young to consent in an adult manner. Additionally, when he spoke of the younger male/older male relationships in a positive light, he was referencing his first serious relationship with a 29 year old when he was 17.
view the rest of the comments →
TheOA ago
This will show you all you need to know on why Milo resigned, and why this "new" evidence isn't really new. This was all orchestrated. And frankly Milo is a pedophile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD064D-yr44
witch_doctor1 ago
No, he's not...pedophiles prey on pre-pubescent children. Milo has never done that or advocated that.
TheOA ago
So we're here researching Clinton and Epstein's horrific nature. You're telling me if it turned out there was solid proof of Clinton having sex with a 13 year old that you wouldn't pull the Pedophile card? Come on. Any sane person knows sex with a 13 year old is not okay, and only a pedophile would morally accept or encourage sex from someone that just reached puberty.
witch_doctor1 ago
This is a complicated issue because there is so much emotion wrapped around it...what gets lost in the discussion is a true pedophile vs. someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor that is under the legal age of consent. What we are likely to see soon are videos of someone holding down a screaming or drugged child <10 years old and raping them...that is pedophilia, and nowhere close to what Milo was talking about.
When you are talking minors who are post-pubescent but not of the legal age of consent, that is where everyone gets their panties in a knot. The issue is not that you are abhorrent because you see children and become sexually aroused (and yes, those people are truly evil)...because post-pubescent minors are of reproductive age but are not yet mentally or emotionally ready to have sexual relationships, either with adults or peers. I was 5'10', 190 pounds and muscular as a 13 year old...a young teenager's mind in an adult body.
This is why the consent laws aimed at post-pubescent minors are essentially about addressing coercion or abuse of power...in other words, that 16 year old girl with big boobs may look 18, but she's not, and while you would not be abnormal for thinking she looks good naked, you would still be abusing her by being an adult and having sex with someone who is not mentally or emotionally mature enough to consent to that relationship. Another example of this, is most states have laws that teachers cannot have sex with their students, even if they are over the age of 18...and why is that? It is the coercion and abuse of power thing.
The point is that attraction to post-pubescent females or males is normal, but the age of consent laws directed at this age group are designed to protect immature minors in adult bodies from consenting into sexual relationships that they are not yet capable of consenting. Hence the term "statutory rape". And that is the problem I have with loosely calling Milo a pedophile...he is not a pedophile because he is not attracted to pre-pubescent boys. Did you miss the part where he said the age of consent laws were about right? His views on young male/older male relationships are warped because he was statutorily raped. In his mind, he consented and it felt good at the time...but in reality he was taken advantage of by a priest when he was too young to consent in an adult manner. Additionally, when he spoke of the younger male/older male relationships in a positive light, he was referencing his first serious relationship with a 29 year old when he was 17.
Milo is not the enemy, nor is he a pedophile...