Many people are abused by people of both sexes and it doesn't seem to have an impact on their adult sexual preferences. It does have impact development. However, despite a nature vs nurture debate that goes on in psychology, in which the answer is usually both nature and nurture, sexuality seems to be more genetic in nature. This also goes without saying most of what I learned also seemed to indicate that sexuality was more a gradient than it was binary (or tertiary with bisexuality) 100% one or the other.
So to your statement, I doubt his abuse "made him gay" and he would otherwise be "100% straight". Yes being abused can have a major impact on development, I've never seen any sources in my time at the university studying psychology that would backup that people can be made gay any more than they can be made straight.
So, funnily enough, it's actually more nurture than it is nature. Check out the twin studies done in Sweden & Australia for more information. That said, you're right about sexual abuse not deciding who is gay vs. who isn't. It really doesn't have much of an impact, because being gay isn't a fault of character. It's actually evolutionarily advantageous in moderation.
so you're telling me that your leftist run university isn't studying the root cause of gayness? tell me why the black community has so many more fags percentage wise than any other group
'blacks' or subsaharrans have more 'gays' as their culture of cannibalism is raping, robbing, killing another human, they have no other talents and produce zero commodities, subsaharrans who's religous heritage is voodoo pretend to be shapeshifters, pretending to be gay to rape anybody regardless of sex.
view the rest of the comments →
EarlPoncho ago
and now he's gay. just a coincidence im sure
Stukov ago
Many people are abused by people of both sexes and it doesn't seem to have an impact on their adult sexual preferences. It does have impact development. However, despite a nature vs nurture debate that goes on in psychology, in which the answer is usually both nature and nurture, sexuality seems to be more genetic in nature. This also goes without saying most of what I learned also seemed to indicate that sexuality was more a gradient than it was binary (or tertiary with bisexuality) 100% one or the other.
So to your statement, I doubt his abuse "made him gay" and he would otherwise be "100% straight". Yes being abused can have a major impact on development, I've never seen any sources in my time at the university studying psychology that would backup that people can be made gay any more than they can be made straight.
pls-no-lynch-nsa ago
So, funnily enough, it's actually more nurture than it is nature. Check out the twin studies done in Sweden & Australia for more information. That said, you're right about sexual abuse not deciding who is gay vs. who isn't. It really doesn't have much of an impact, because being gay isn't a fault of character. It's actually evolutionarily advantageous in moderation.
EarlPoncho ago
so you're telling me that your leftist run university isn't studying the root cause of gayness? tell me why the black community has so many more fags percentage wise than any other group
BGAIN ago
'blacks' or subsaharrans have more 'gays' as their culture of cannibalism is raping, robbing, killing another human, they have no other talents and produce zero commodities, subsaharrans who's religous heritage is voodoo pretend to be shapeshifters, pretending to be gay to rape anybody regardless of sex.
Stukov ago
I don't think any answer I give, even if I had access to papers still and gave sources, would matter to you.
EarlPoncho ago
or maybe you just don't have the sources and want to hang on the fact that you took a college class to get me to blindly believe anything you say