This is what I don't like about many Pizzagate researchers, thinking that scepticism = pedo.
The e-mails are weird.
Pedophilia symbols in heavy breathing are weird.
But this is a random pedo chat, how big is the chance it has leads? I just think we should focus on important things, not waste time on irrelevant things. If you think it has leads, track down all e-mail addresses and look at search results. If you get an interesting lead in that way, post again.
view the rest of the comments →
Ushil ago
What makes it interesting for pizzagate?
Stacia42 ago
It gives email addresses. I thought it might be a good lead.
Ushil ago
But if it are regular pedos I doubt it will be interesting.
Stacia42 ago
Excuse me? Isn't it pedos that we need to investigate? Why would you say that??
Ushil ago
Yes, but what's the sense of investigating a regular pedo of which it is unlikely he/she is connected to Podesta or the Clinton Foundation?
Stacia42 ago
You know you are fighting pretty hard for this not to be looked at
Ushil ago
This is what I don't like about many Pizzagate researchers, thinking that scepticism = pedo. The e-mails are weird. Pedophilia symbols in heavy breathing are weird.
But this is a random pedo chat, how big is the chance it has leads? I just think we should focus on important things, not waste time on irrelevant things. If you think it has leads, track down all e-mail addresses and look at search results. If you get an interesting lead in that way, post again.
fartyshorts ago
Nothing wrong with getting more eyes on something. That's what the other subverses are for, but no one fucking reads those.