Bad idea to promote ambiguous evidence. The tweet refers to the ACORN scandal. More interesting is his remarks about ping pong on tv show. Ping pong is a common codeword that has barely been examined here.
How does this > "How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me." refer to Acorn? Or is that the newest misdirection?
More interesting is his remarks about ping pong on tv show.
then provide a link, make a submission by all means.
No doubt you'll make a breathless post like this - "LOOK!!!!! PING PONG CIRCLES AND STARS ON FLAGS, GIRL SCOUT BADGES AND FLAGS OF WORLD SATANIC COUNTRIES PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The explanation, I've read it at several news websites, is that the O'Keefe ACORN sting where he dressed as a pimp of a young girl was all that tweet is about. But that's just a theory. Breitbart didn't say that.
I have thought about this a lot. If it's that one event, why "world class" and "sex slave op"? That doesn't fit with O'Keefe walking into ACORN as a pimp. It's a much broader accusation than is called for by that undercover sting.
I think Breitbart knew something more. But like everyone who knows, it's dangerous. And then he was dead.
What you say makes sense - "sex slave op" would not be the go to short description. And "world class" also takes it even further out of the running. So it is a misdirection argument, or misinfo, or both brought to us by DonKeyass. Noted.
i have noticed your shilling before. everyone knows this is garbage evidence, tweeted during the fallout of okeefe with UNDERAGE prostitutes (so your boy just misrepresented it by saying okeefe was just a pimp). i am not saying they didnt kill him, but that happened a year later.
the point is its bad evidence that can go nowhere since it requires speculating about a dead mans verbiage
view the rest of the comments →
Don-Keyhote ago
Bad idea to promote ambiguous evidence. The tweet refers to the ACORN scandal. More interesting is his remarks about ping pong on tv show. Ping pong is a common codeword that has barely been examined here.
VieBleu ago
How does this > "How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me." refer to Acorn? Or is that the newest misdirection?
then provide a link, make a submission by all means.
No doubt you'll make a breathless post like this - "LOOK!!!!! PING PONG CIRCLES AND STARS ON FLAGS, GIRL SCOUT BADGES AND FLAGS OF WORLD SATANIC COUNTRIES PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
B_dog ago
The explanation, I've read it at several news websites, is that the O'Keefe ACORN sting where he dressed as a pimp of a young girl was all that tweet is about. But that's just a theory. Breitbart didn't say that.
I have thought about this a lot. If it's that one event, why "world class" and "sex slave op"? That doesn't fit with O'Keefe walking into ACORN as a pimp. It's a much broader accusation than is called for by that undercover sting.
I think Breitbart knew something more. But like everyone who knows, it's dangerous. And then he was dead.
VieBleu ago
thank you for a sane response!
What you say makes sense - "sex slave op" would not be the go to short description. And "world class" also takes it even further out of the running. So it is a misdirection argument, or misinfo, or both brought to us by DonKeyass. Noted.
Don-Keyhote ago
i have noticed your shilling before. everyone knows this is garbage evidence, tweeted during the fallout of okeefe with UNDERAGE prostitutes (so your boy just misrepresented it by saying okeefe was just a pimp). i am not saying they didnt kill him, but that happened a year later.
the point is its bad evidence that can go nowhere since it requires speculating about a dead mans verbiage