Yes, that TOTALLY absolves him from saying the following:
You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.
to which the host responded:
You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can be honest about that?”
and Milo continues:
Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual
So fucking them at 13 is SAVING THEM FROM SUICIDE. And that's NOT PEDOPHILIA, it's just FUCKING YOUNG BOYS and saving them from SUICIDE.
COMPLETLY UNDERSTANDALBE.
The only reaons he apologizes is because his gravy train just came to a screeching halt. His apology is a non-apology where he never ONCE says the behavior above is unacceptable(because it is not PRE-pubescent pedophilia). He might allude to the consent ages being 'roughly the right age', but that's a whole lotta wiggle room considering the comments above. He also tries to play it off, because 'he never thought he'd be this famous' and that there were a lotta of late night streams, ha ha ha ... non - fucking - apology bullshit.
You can surely accept his apology if you like, but realize there are others that just can't bend over far enough to actually stick our heads completely inside our assholes.
You are totally mischaracterizing everything he said...and yes, he is correct that pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescent children...and he explains in the second video I posted that he was essentially talking about was himself in all of these videos. He NEVER advocated 13 year olds having sex with adults, that was the mixing of two seperate exchanges...the young boy relationship with older man comment referenced the relationship he entered into as a 17yo with a 29yo (16 is age of consent in UK), as evidenced in this video clip forwarded to correct time,,, https://youtu.be/osFtCcpFrXI?t=358
This is clearly a coordinated attack on Milo using edited fragments of several interviews...Milo is not the enemy....
He NEVER advocated 13 year olds having sex with adults
Nope, and never said a thing against it either, because its not pedophilia ... right?
that was the mixing of two seperate exchanges
That's bullshit, he said it on Joe Rogan as well I was in my teens, 14 Joe asks, something like that he responds. Later responding, I was a very mature 14 year old and when I was 14 I was the predator. And then talks about hollywood parties with underage boys and won't name names, obviously protecting hollywood pedos, but that's OK to because .... reasons!
This is clearly a coordinated attack on Milo using edited fragments of several interviews...Milo is not the enemy....
No, it's Milo in his own words. He wasn't being inarticulate, he said what he meant ... until he lost his book deal at least. If you want to hero worship this fucking stain of humanity, that's fine. Just don't expect the rest of us to suspend reality so we can see what a decent fucking dude this is.
It's pretty simple to overcome, just name the hollywood pedos, then I'll believe him.
No, he didn't he spoke out, CLEARLY against pedophilia, but show me where he speaks out against underage boys and older men. Remeber, that's NOT pedophilia,so where does he speak out against that.
No no no, again, he's talking about pedophiles. I watched the entire video several times, and he definitely and repeatedly denouces pedophilia, but never ONCE says older men should be with post-pubescent boys. I get it, you LOVE him and you want to be his apologist and make everything OK. Problem is, the facts don't support your point of view.
And ALL of that is bluster, until he names the hollywood pedos. Why is it OK to you he wont name KNOWN hollywood pedos. Please explain.
No, the older men younger boy reference was a direct reference to 17 year old Milo with his 29 year old boyfriend...in other words, he was talking about himself.
That's NOT what he told Joe Rogan, was he lying then, or is he lying now? And WHY is it OK that he won't name the hollywood pedos? Why is it OK that he protects them?
"And WHY is it OK that he won't name the hollywood pedos? Why is it OK that he protects them?" Protecting himself, doesn't want to be suicided....Milo is not the enemy..
view the rest of the comments →
p0ssum ago
Yes, that TOTALLY absolves him from saying the following:
to which the host responded:
and Milo continues:
So fucking them at 13 is SAVING THEM FROM SUICIDE. And that's NOT PEDOPHILIA, it's just FUCKING YOUNG BOYS and saving them from SUICIDE.
COMPLETLY UNDERSTANDALBE.
The only reaons he apologizes is because his gravy train just came to a screeching halt. His apology is a non-apology where he never ONCE says the behavior above is unacceptable(because it is not PRE-pubescent pedophilia). He might allude to the consent ages being 'roughly the right age', but that's a whole lotta wiggle room considering the comments above. He also tries to play it off, because 'he never thought he'd be this famous' and that there were a lotta of late night streams, ha ha ha ... non - fucking - apology bullshit.
You can surely accept his apology if you like, but realize there are others that just can't bend over far enough to actually stick our heads completely inside our assholes.
witch_doctor1 ago
You are totally mischaracterizing everything he said...and yes, he is correct that pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescent children...and he explains in the second video I posted that he was essentially talking about was himself in all of these videos. He NEVER advocated 13 year olds having sex with adults, that was the mixing of two seperate exchanges...the young boy relationship with older man comment referenced the relationship he entered into as a 17yo with a 29yo (16 is age of consent in UK), as evidenced in this video clip forwarded to correct time,,, https://youtu.be/osFtCcpFrXI?t=358
This is clearly a coordinated attack on Milo using edited fragments of several interviews...Milo is not the enemy....
p0ssum ago
Nope, and never said a thing against it either, because its not pedophilia ... right?
That's bullshit, he said it on Joe Rogan as well I was in my teens, 14 Joe asks, something like that he responds. Later responding, I was a very mature 14 year old and when I was 14 I was the predator. And then talks about hollywood parties with underage boys and won't name names, obviously protecting hollywood pedos, but that's OK to because .... reasons!
No, it's Milo in his own words. He wasn't being inarticulate, he said what he meant ... until he lost his book deal at least. If you want to hero worship this fucking stain of humanity, that's fine. Just don't expect the rest of us to suspend reality so we can see what a decent fucking dude this is.
It's pretty simple to overcome, just name the hollywood pedos, then I'll believe him.
witch_doctor1 ago
"never said a thing against it either" Yes, he clearly did. That is a blatant lie.
p0ssum ago
No, he didn't he spoke out, CLEARLY against pedophilia, but show me where he speaks out against underage boys and older men. Remeber, that's NOT pedophilia,so where does he speak out against that.
witch_doctor1 ago
If you watched the links I posted and didn't see it, then you weren't looking....
p0ssum ago
No no no, again, he's talking about pedophiles. I watched the entire video several times, and he definitely and repeatedly denouces pedophilia, but never ONCE says older men should be with post-pubescent boys. I get it, you LOVE him and you want to be his apologist and make everything OK. Problem is, the facts don't support your point of view.
And ALL of that is bluster, until he names the hollywood pedos. Why is it OK to you he wont name KNOWN hollywood pedos. Please explain.
witch_doctor1 ago
No, the older men younger boy reference was a direct reference to 17 year old Milo with his 29 year old boyfriend...in other words, he was talking about himself.
p0ssum ago
That's NOT what he told Joe Rogan, was he lying then, or is he lying now? And WHY is it OK that he won't name the hollywood pedos? Why is it OK that he protects them?
witch_doctor1 ago
"And WHY is it OK that he won't name the hollywood pedos? Why is it OK that he protects them?" Protecting himself, doesn't want to be suicided....Milo is not the enemy..
p0ssum ago
LOL, Okay, right, got it.
Yes, he is.