The Occam's Razor argument that explains the varied sketches of one suspect in the McCann abduction is thus:
A) The POLICE are lying. The varied efit renderings are of TWO different men, not one. Those men are both Tony and John Podesta.
B) During the abduction in an effort to sow confusion in case they were seen, Madeline was handed off relay style by the Podestas, while brought to what many suspect is Freud's nearby residence.
That's not an Occam's Razor argument at all. You are supposed to find an answer that fits the facts, your "relay style" handoff is just making shit up.
Throughout this whole investigation, people have been acting like if they act like screenwriters and fleshing out the known facts with wildy imaginative speculation, and acting like that is legitimate and it's not. So many people have been making a movie in their heads and pretending that makes them detectives.
If the cops are lying, then what about the witnesses who were the basis for the Efits sketches? Are they lying too? Or did they just ignore how the police characterized the evidence they provided to police. Do you think they really said it was two men between 60 and 80 years old? and when the cops said one man between 20-40, they were just like, OK, we'll go with that?
Making shit up? Fuck you @arewesure. Occam's razor is the most likely explanation for an event and it absolutely applies to my post and this investigation. Of course they both carried Madeline, that neatly explains the varied efit descriptions. And of course the police are lying. Why is this investigation dead and there are no new leads? Because the criminals are known and are being protected.
Side note: You're a real piece of shit and have accumulated the most negative points of anyone on this sub. You are the one making a movie in your addled little mind. Nobody likes you. You're a scumbag apologist for pedophiles and you're going to rot in hell. FUCK YOU JOHN PODESTA !!
Occam's Razor IS NOT how can I line things up so that they agree with my previously held beliefs.
Here's how Occam's Razor is applied.
If the UK, police are lying and want to cover this up, why release these sketches at all in 2013? How does this align with known facts?
And the known facts are in 2013, the UK police completely changed the timeline and understanding of what happened that night and asked people to look at these newly released efits and come forward with information about this suspect. How does these known facts square with police want a cover up. A coverup would want less attention on the case, why would refocus attention on something they were covering up? Why redo the investigation and cross check cell phone records and change the previous timeline of the case if they want to protect the men in those sketches? They could have simply done nothing. That would be a lot easier.
Occams razor here would be they look like someone who resembles the podesta's. You know they resemble Jerry McCann too right? A much more plausible theory.
This is much more likely than high profile politicians personally committing the most high profile abduction in the last 20 years - and the police are lying about the mugshots they put out themselves to give everyone a hint about it.
Occam's razor would NOT allow for the extremely long odds of TWO men that look EXACTLY like the Podestas being in SAME location where they have friends and are known to frequent. It would not allow for John Podesta's emails being wiped clean on the day McCann disappeared. It would not allow for the Madeline's eye anomaly being of great interest to Soros and his paid underlings, the Podestas. Good God, this is like teaching an infant to play poker.
You're making quite a few assumptions there though. The one with the fewest is Occams Razor - by definition.
Also source on the podestas being known to frequent that spot? News to me. Also source on JP's emails being wiped on that day? I thought there were loads of days where he didn't respond/have emails done. What makes you think it was wiped?
Just trying to get all the info, no need to be rude.
You don't have the facts, you jerk. You are full of nothing but questions and yet, you pretend to have all the answers. I am making no assumptions. Have you been following this investigation? Do you realize there is PRIMA FACIE evidence to bring in the Podestas for questioning, right now? Yet, here you are, defending them. FUCK YOU.
I've run out of patience with you. You have been following? Is that right? Then why don't you know this information and why are you putting your opinion over the KNOWN FACTS?
Like I put in my other reply, what you were saying is not "KNOWN FACTS" - you are just exaggerating upon loose links to create bullshit claims to stand your assertions upon.
I'm all for investigating these pedo fucks - but please stop acting like a complete dick in response to me just asking questions. There is nothing wrong with that. You just seem to have gotten super angry with me because I proved you to be making shit up.
view the rest of the comments →
remedy4reality ago
The Occam's Razor argument that explains the varied sketches of one suspect in the McCann abduction is thus:
A) The POLICE are lying. The varied efit renderings are of TWO different men, not one. Those men are both Tony and John Podesta.
B) During the abduction in an effort to sow confusion in case they were seen, Madeline was handed off relay style by the Podestas, while brought to what many suspect is Freud's nearby residence.
AreWeSure ago
That's not an Occam's Razor argument at all. You are supposed to find an answer that fits the facts, your "relay style" handoff is just making shit up.
Throughout this whole investigation, people have been acting like if they act like screenwriters and fleshing out the known facts with wildy imaginative speculation, and acting like that is legitimate and it's not. So many people have been making a movie in their heads and pretending that makes them detectives.
If the cops are lying, then what about the witnesses who were the basis for the Efits sketches? Are they lying too? Or did they just ignore how the police characterized the evidence they provided to police. Do you think they really said it was two men between 60 and 80 years old? and when the cops said one man between 20-40, they were just like, OK, we'll go with that?
remedy4reality ago
Making shit up? Fuck you @arewesure. Occam's razor is the most likely explanation for an event and it absolutely applies to my post and this investigation. Of course they both carried Madeline, that neatly explains the varied efit descriptions. And of course the police are lying. Why is this investigation dead and there are no new leads? Because the criminals are known and are being protected.
Side note: You're a real piece of shit and have accumulated the most negative points of anyone on this sub. You are the one making a movie in your addled little mind. Nobody likes you. You're a scumbag apologist for pedophiles and you're going to rot in hell. FUCK YOU JOHN PODESTA !!
AreWeSure ago
Occam's Razor IS NOT how can I line things up so that they agree with my previously held beliefs.
Here's how Occam's Razor is applied.
If the UK, police are lying and want to cover this up, why release these sketches at all in 2013? How does this align with known facts?
And the known facts are in 2013, the UK police completely changed the timeline and understanding of what happened that night and asked people to look at these newly released efits and come forward with information about this suspect. How does these known facts square with police want a cover up. A coverup would want less attention on the case, why would refocus attention on something they were covering up? Why redo the investigation and cross check cell phone records and change the previous timeline of the case if they want to protect the men in those sketches? They could have simply done nothing. That would be a lot easier.
remedy4reality ago
You're rationalizing your own held beliefs, you fucking pile of shit.
WHY DO THE TWO EFITS LOOK EXACTLY LIKE THE PODESTA'S, YOU DUMB FUCK?
Answer: BECAUSE IT IS THE PODESTAS !! THAT IS OCCAM'S RAZOR, YOU RHETORICAL RETARD.
cky_stew ago
Occams razor here would be they look like someone who resembles the podesta's. You know they resemble Jerry McCann too right? A much more plausible theory.
This is much more likely than high profile politicians personally committing the most high profile abduction in the last 20 years - and the police are lying about the mugshots they put out themselves to give everyone a hint about it.
remedy4reality ago
Occam's razor would NOT allow for the extremely long odds of TWO men that look EXACTLY like the Podestas being in SAME location where they have friends and are known to frequent. It would not allow for John Podesta's emails being wiped clean on the day McCann disappeared. It would not allow for the Madeline's eye anomaly being of great interest to Soros and his paid underlings, the Podestas. Good God, this is like teaching an infant to play poker.
cky_stew ago
You're making quite a few assumptions there though. The one with the fewest is Occams Razor - by definition.
Also source on the podestas being known to frequent that spot? News to me. Also source on JP's emails being wiped on that day? I thought there were loads of days where he didn't respond/have emails done. What makes you think it was wiped?
Just trying to get all the info, no need to be rude.
remedy4reality ago
You don't have the facts, you jerk. You are full of nothing but questions and yet, you pretend to have all the answers. I am making no assumptions. Have you been following this investigation? Do you realize there is PRIMA FACIE evidence to bring in the Podestas for questioning, right now? Yet, here you are, defending them. FUCK YOU.
cky_stew ago
Yeah I have been following pizzagate since before it was even called that.
I always question everything, it's healthy to do so.
Now, are you going to answer my questions or just say "FUCK YOU" and run away?
remedy4reality ago
Look at the link, you fuckwad.
Look at the email about the trip to Portugal.
I've run out of patience with you. You have been following? Is that right? Then why don't you know this information and why are you putting your opinion over the KNOWN FACTS?
cky_stew ago
Like I put in my other reply, what you were saying is not "KNOWN FACTS" - you are just exaggerating upon loose links to create bullshit claims to stand your assertions upon.
I'm all for investigating these pedo fucks - but please stop acting like a complete dick in response to me just asking questions. There is nothing wrong with that. You just seem to have gotten super angry with me because I proved you to be making shit up.