You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Singleservename ago

Feinstein also asked questions on human trafficking in Congress during affirmation hearings, can't remember whose.

Problem is, the Feinsteins are among the most corrupted, sociopathic, pure evil fucks within the elites. And as we all know, that is saying quite something.

They obviously want to capture this topic for their own agenda. Be very aware.

listentoreason2017 ago

"The Feinsteins are very interested in this topic" aka "most corrupted, sociopathic, pure evil fucks" ???

Whats the criteria for not being suspicious of someone who shows an interest in human trafficking?

Singleservename ago

First do some research into the Feinsteins. Then get back to me whether they satisfy YOUR criteria.

listentoreason2017 ago

Sure I'll do that.

But serious though, what's your criteria for NOT being suspicious of someone?

Singleservename ago

The criterium in this case is simply NOT being Feinstein.

I detect a rather subtle form of gaslighting in your persistence. Interesting.

listentoreason2017 ago

I'm not trying to be obtuse. I'm just asking what constitutes a true ally in the fight against human trafficking and a false ally.

Singleservename ago

Ok. Simple answer. Anyone genuinely concerned about the topic is an ally as long as they have no prior behavior similar to that which causes abuse in the first place.

So, the Feinsteins don't qualify. At all.

listentoreason2017 ago

Gotcha.

Can you show me where the Feinsteins are sick fucks? Because when I google Feinstein pedophile, I get shit about a WWF promoter and when I google Dianne Feinstein pedophile or sex abuse, I get articles about this.

Singleservename ago

With such simplistic hermeneutics you won't find anything on the real power players except maybe pre-gaslit tin foil shit.

Start with the way they tried to privatize, monopolize and exploit the water supply in California.

listentoreason2017 ago

Yeah sure. They're corporatist like most in Congress. Loads wrong with the leadership of both parties in Congress in terms of corporate influence.

But where is the source for them having 'prior behavior similar to that which causes abuse' aka child abuse/human trafficking?