Unfortunately here in Britain they've done all they can to supress the findings of the police.
The McCanns did not join in the search for Madeleine that first night she was missing. They left the sliding door to the apartment unlocked, even though they were not using it to enter the house. Kate later recalls that she was worried that someone had tried breaking in the night before yet leaves the door unlocked. She tells the police that the shutters have been forced open as the point of entry, yet police find no evidence of forced entry, and only one set of prints on the shutters. Kate McCanns.
Then there is the smell of cadaver in the apartment and on Kate McCanns clothes, on Madeleine's toy and pyjamas and in their rental car. Blood in the car and apartment. The complete lack of physical evidence of anyone having broke in or been in the apartment other than the McCanns. Witnesses possibly seeing Gerry carrying a child toward the sea. The initial lies of Kate to the police and the fact she refused to answer their questions. The changing story of their friends of what happened that night. Their complete lack of emotion in appeals for her return.
Madeleine died in the apartment, accidentally or not.
I also think it's about time people stop linking the Podesta brothers to Madeleine as that identikit is of the same person and looks a lot like Gerry McCann. The only 'proof' that the Podesta brothers are connected, unless anyone can find anything else, is from FBIanon. They are supposed friends of a well known pedo that lived in the area, ex-MP Clement Freud, and were using his house at the time of the abduction. However I can not find any more information except for what FBIanon has said. The emails did start the day after the 'abduction' but that could be a coincidence.
When the podestas provide an alibi they will be discounted until then they have remained silent probably in anticipation of having anything they say used against them, it's called the Miranda rights in the us. Their silence is one of the most telling clues to their guilt. The misdirection of the fake news label is as well. They are clearly avoiding a frank discussion. That is NOT typical of someone who has nothing to hide.
One of the most common tactics of a defense attorney is to provide an alternate perpetrator in order to create reasonable doubt. Just as you are trying to put the entire blame on the McCanns based on a cadaver dog, and their silence during the investigation. The next tactic that a defense attorney will use is to eliminate evidence from the case in order to create reasonable doubt. Just as Hillary clinton when defending the child rapist had the DNA discredited by an expert. And then laughed about it on record.
The cadaver dog indicates a dead body. It could be madekines or it could be someone else was used in a ritual murder, that is not far fetched when you consider the network they all associate with. They also have a ritual called a changeling ritual which involves
Kid napping. You jump from cadaver dog to requesting the forum stop looking into podesta. The mcanns seem complicit and so do the podestas. I will say that the podestas which have spent millions trying to clear their name through a shilling campaign. I really hope that is not what you are doing.
Unless the podestas can conclusively explain artwork and email codes, the unbelievable number of friendships with other pedofiles, the artwork on display, the death of so many key opponents, AND provide an alibi they currently remain the main suspects. if the parents are guilty throw them in the list but it iS NOT one or the other....you cannot eliminate evidence just to fit your theory. Your argument needs to be evidence based.
I never said stop looking into Podesta. Typical of some of you on this forum who misrepresent suggestions when it doesn't make the Podestas out to be involved in every crime imaginable.
I am 100% convinced the Podestas are pedos and possibly cannibals. Nowhere do I say that he's not. I'm saying that the evidence in the McCann case points to her death in the apartment. There is no evidence but the word of FBIanon to suggest the Podestas are even friends with Clement Freud, the pedo who lived in the area. Focus on what we know and stop unnecessarily accusing them of crimes that there is no evidence they are involved in. The identikit photos of the McCann 'abductor' is used in a lot of people's summary of the case against the Podestas and it makes the rest of it look ridiculous. Just as calling it pizzagate when it's more than one pizza place.
And don't call me a shill when you can't even read my post properly.
I apologize if you thought I called you a shill. I assure you I did not, believe me I am not above saying that directly. I will say I hope you were not shilling for the podestas. Trust me I have no patience lately for shills. Now I will paste you own words as to why I thought you said to stop looking into podesta:
"I also think it's about time people stop linking the Podesta brothers to Madeleine as that identikit is of the same person and looks a lot like Gerry McCann. The only 'proof' that the Podesta brothers are connected, unless anyone can find anything else, is from FBIanon. They are supposed friends of a well known pedo that lived in the area, ex-MP Clement Freud, and were using his house at the time of the abduction. However I can not find any more information except for what FBIanon has said. The emails did start the day after the 'abduction' but that could be a coincidence."
The theory that it is one person is faulty. It is two different witnesses that each saw an individual. This might reflect a separate time frame that each one saw, or it might reflect a different line of sight. This is not known. So we cannot speculate. The evidence is a corpse in the apt and the trunk. The EFIT that matches the two brothers who do not bear a resemblance to each other maybe gerry McCann. The parents were uncooperative and remain suspects. The friendship with clement freud remains questionable and needs explanation. It also connects all of them. Now podestas have not provided an alibi. Instead they have remained silent. You or I do not have access to customs so we cannot verify nor exclude the podestas. Unless they provide an alibi they remain prime suspects. They have been placed at the scene by two witnesses. That the witnesses say they saw one person may be accurate one brother might have been looking out or starting the car while the other carried the baby. Was she alive ? Speculation. Were the parents involved? Very likely!
So far the facts tell me the podestas are avoiding this and are desperate to create misdirection, including putting the full blame on the mcann's. Typical when a group of criminals get caught. The police need to do their job and the podestas need an alibi. Plain and simple. They refuse to provide one. Please explain that to me. It's premature to eliminate a lead based on speculation. There remains over those two brothers a giant question mark and a ton of incriminating circumstantial evidence....and worse right now they are laughing because they know that they got away with it. And they will do it again and again!
I've been collating my research into one post for release tomorrow. I've looked into your claims and I actually now can't exonerate the Podestas either. I found another link beside Fbi anon that links the Podestas to Freud and also the accusations of sexual abuse by the McCanns friends.
I never considered the idea that Madeleine could have died in the room after been abused or was taken by the Podestas at the behest of the McCanns which would explain the cadaver smell and blood in the car they rented weeks later. They'd gotten the body back.
view the rest of the comments →
hir0ce1ine ago
Unfortunately here in Britain they've done all they can to supress the findings of the police. The McCanns did not join in the search for Madeleine that first night she was missing. They left the sliding door to the apartment unlocked, even though they were not using it to enter the house. Kate later recalls that she was worried that someone had tried breaking in the night before yet leaves the door unlocked. She tells the police that the shutters have been forced open as the point of entry, yet police find no evidence of forced entry, and only one set of prints on the shutters. Kate McCanns.
Then there is the smell of cadaver in the apartment and on Kate McCanns clothes, on Madeleine's toy and pyjamas and in their rental car. Blood in the car and apartment. The complete lack of physical evidence of anyone having broke in or been in the apartment other than the McCanns. Witnesses possibly seeing Gerry carrying a child toward the sea. The initial lies of Kate to the police and the fact she refused to answer their questions. The changing story of their friends of what happened that night. Their complete lack of emotion in appeals for her return. Madeleine died in the apartment, accidentally or not.
I also think it's about time people stop linking the Podesta brothers to Madeleine as that identikit is of the same person and looks a lot like Gerry McCann. The only 'proof' that the Podesta brothers are connected, unless anyone can find anything else, is from FBIanon. They are supposed friends of a well known pedo that lived in the area, ex-MP Clement Freud, and were using his house at the time of the abduction. However I can not find any more information except for what FBIanon has said. The emails did start the day after the 'abduction' but that could be a coincidence.
Forgetmenot ago
When the podestas provide an alibi they will be discounted until then they have remained silent probably in anticipation of having anything they say used against them, it's called the Miranda rights in the us. Their silence is one of the most telling clues to their guilt. The misdirection of the fake news label is as well. They are clearly avoiding a frank discussion. That is NOT typical of someone who has nothing to hide.
One of the most common tactics of a defense attorney is to provide an alternate perpetrator in order to create reasonable doubt. Just as you are trying to put the entire blame on the McCanns based on a cadaver dog, and their silence during the investigation. The next tactic that a defense attorney will use is to eliminate evidence from the case in order to create reasonable doubt. Just as Hillary clinton when defending the child rapist had the DNA discredited by an expert. And then laughed about it on record.
The cadaver dog indicates a dead body. It could be madekines or it could be someone else was used in a ritual murder, that is not far fetched when you consider the network they all associate with. They also have a ritual called a changeling ritual which involves Kid napping. You jump from cadaver dog to requesting the forum stop looking into podesta. The mcanns seem complicit and so do the podestas. I will say that the podestas which have spent millions trying to clear their name through a shilling campaign. I really hope that is not what you are doing.
Unless the podestas can conclusively explain artwork and email codes, the unbelievable number of friendships with other pedofiles, the artwork on display, the death of so many key opponents, AND provide an alibi they currently remain the main suspects. if the parents are guilty throw them in the list but it iS NOT one or the other....you cannot eliminate evidence just to fit your theory. Your argument needs to be evidence based.
hir0ce1ine ago
I never said stop looking into Podesta. Typical of some of you on this forum who misrepresent suggestions when it doesn't make the Podestas out to be involved in every crime imaginable.
I am 100% convinced the Podestas are pedos and possibly cannibals. Nowhere do I say that he's not. I'm saying that the evidence in the McCann case points to her death in the apartment. There is no evidence but the word of FBIanon to suggest the Podestas are even friends with Clement Freud, the pedo who lived in the area. Focus on what we know and stop unnecessarily accusing them of crimes that there is no evidence they are involved in. The identikit photos of the McCann 'abductor' is used in a lot of people's summary of the case against the Podestas and it makes the rest of it look ridiculous. Just as calling it pizzagate when it's more than one pizza place.
And don't call me a shill when you can't even read my post properly.
Forgetmenot ago
I apologize if you thought I called you a shill. I assure you I did not, believe me I am not above saying that directly. I will say I hope you were not shilling for the podestas. Trust me I have no patience lately for shills. Now I will paste you own words as to why I thought you said to stop looking into podesta:
"I also think it's about time people stop linking the Podesta brothers to Madeleine as that identikit is of the same person and looks a lot like Gerry McCann. The only 'proof' that the Podesta brothers are connected, unless anyone can find anything else, is from FBIanon. They are supposed friends of a well known pedo that lived in the area, ex-MP Clement Freud, and were using his house at the time of the abduction. However I can not find any more information except for what FBIanon has said. The emails did start the day after the 'abduction' but that could be a coincidence."
The theory that it is one person is faulty. It is two different witnesses that each saw an individual. This might reflect a separate time frame that each one saw, or it might reflect a different line of sight. This is not known. So we cannot speculate. The evidence is a corpse in the apt and the trunk. The EFIT that matches the two brothers who do not bear a resemblance to each other maybe gerry McCann. The parents were uncooperative and remain suspects. The friendship with clement freud remains questionable and needs explanation. It also connects all of them. Now podestas have not provided an alibi. Instead they have remained silent. You or I do not have access to customs so we cannot verify nor exclude the podestas. Unless they provide an alibi they remain prime suspects. They have been placed at the scene by two witnesses. That the witnesses say they saw one person may be accurate one brother might have been looking out or starting the car while the other carried the baby. Was she alive ? Speculation. Were the parents involved? Very likely! So far the facts tell me the podestas are avoiding this and are desperate to create misdirection, including putting the full blame on the mcann's. Typical when a group of criminals get caught. The police need to do their job and the podestas need an alibi. Plain and simple. They refuse to provide one. Please explain that to me. It's premature to eliminate a lead based on speculation. There remains over those two brothers a giant question mark and a ton of incriminating circumstantial evidence....and worse right now they are laughing because they know that they got away with it. And they will do it again and again!
hir0ce1ine ago
I've been collating my research into one post for release tomorrow. I've looked into your claims and I actually now can't exonerate the Podestas either. I found another link beside Fbi anon that links the Podestas to Freud and also the accusations of sexual abuse by the McCanns friends.
I never considered the idea that Madeleine could have died in the room after been abused or was taken by the Podestas at the behest of the McCanns which would explain the cadaver smell and blood in the car they rented weeks later. They'd gotten the body back.
kazza64 ago
when i saw those identikit photos surface during the election they looked so much like john and tony podesta i thought they were a joke